Effect of fiber and energy in diet on productivity and formation of microbiocenosis in piglets

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Today, an important role in the development of pig breeding is given to feeding animals, especially piglets during the transition from milk to vegetable feeding. This crucial period is associated with physiological characteristics of piglet growth and development. Therefore, the problem of developing mixed fodder that gives rise to high weight gain in piglets is relevant for pig farming. The experiments were conducted on piglets aged 15-42 days in Nadezhda farm, Kursk region. The purpose of the research was to increase productivity and form the microbiocenosis in the intestines of piglets. During the study period, barley-wheat mixed fodder was used with additional ingredients: feed fat, alfalfa grass flour and probiotic. Feed fats provide an optimal level of energy for piglets’ growth. The active substances of alfalfa flour are involved in all metabolic processes in the body, making it effective. Probiotic increases availability and digestibility of feed nutrients. The studies proved that the new composition of SK-3 increased the average daily weight gain by 20.5 %, the gross formation per piglet increased to 21 %. At the same time, survival of animals in the period 15-42 days increased to 100 %. The greatest growth of beneficial intestinal microflora from 107 to 109 CFU/g of feces was observed after feeding experimental piglets with mixed fodder containing grass flour, feed fats and probiotic by day 42. In comparison with the control animals, experimental animals showed a decrease in E. coli - from 107 to 104. The importance of using such ingredients as alfalfa grass flour, feed fats and probiotic in mixed fodder for piglets of 15-42 days of age was revealed. The relevance of the development of new mixed fodder was justified.

Full Text

Table 1. Feed intake by piglets from 15 to 42 days

Age, days

Daily consumption of mixed fodder, g

The feeding period, days

Age, days

Daily consumption of mixed fodder, g

The feeding period, days

15—16

25

2

31—34

150±2.01

4

17—20

50

4

35—36

200±1.75

2

21—25

100

5

37—42

450±2.31

6

26—30

125

5

43—61

660±2.33

18

 

Table 2 Productivity and survival of piglets from 15 to 42 days

Indicators

Control

Experimental

in 15 days, heads
in 42 days, heads

25
23

25
25

Live weight, kg: in 15 days
in 42 days
% to control
Gross weight gain, kg
% to control

1.9±0.75
10.2±1.32
100
8.3±1.52
100

1.9±0.87
11.9±1.47
116.7
10±1.73*
120.5

Average daily gain per experiment, g

307±1.33

370±1.97*

Survival,%

92

100

Note: * reliable at P ≤ 0.05.

 

Table 3. Microbial composition of piglets’ intestines from 15 to 42 days

Type of microorganisms  (CFU / g of feces)

Age of animals, day

15

30

42

Control group

Bifidobacterium

106

107

108

Lactobacillus

106

107

107

E.coli

107

108

109

Experimental group

Bifidobacterium

107

108

109*

Lactobacillus

107

108

109*

E.coli

107

106

104*

Note: * reliable at P ≤ 0.05.

×

About the authors

Nelly V. Vorobyova

Kursk Federal Agricultural Research Center

Author for correspondence.
Email: v.nelli.v@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4246-5725

Candidate of Veterinary Sciences, Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology

70b Karla Marksa st, Kursk, 305021, Kursk Region, Russian Federation

Viktor S. Popov

Kursk Federal Agricultural Research Center

Email: viktor.stugen@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3404-1591

Doctor of Veterinary Sciences, Chief Researcher, Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology

70b Karla Marksa st, Kursk, 305021, Kursk Region, Russian Federation

References

  1. Popov VS, Samburov NV, Vorobyova NV. Korrektsiya metabolizma u svinei s primeneniem immunometabolicheskikh preparatov i kormovykh sredstv [Correction of metabolism in pigs with the use of immunometabolic drugs and feed products]. Kursk; 2014. (In Russ.).
  2. Hansen Ch. Focusing on early life piglet performance is critical for success. International Pig Topics. 2018; 33(2):6—7.
  3. Zijlstra RT, Jha R, Woodward AD, Fouhse J, van Kempen TATG. Starch and fiber properties affect their kinetics of digestion and thereby digestive physiology in pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 2012; 90(suppl_4):49—58. doi: 10.2527/jas.53718
  4. Kononenko SI. Innovations in feeding. Development problems of regional agro-industrial complex. 2016; (1—1):126—130. (In Russ.).
  5. Roselli M, Pieper R, Rogel-Gaillard C, de Vries H, Bailey M, Smidt H, et al. Immunomodulating effects of probiotics for microbiota modulation, gut health and disease resistance in pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2017; 233:104—119. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.07.011
  6. Lavrentiev AY. Productive and meat qualities of pigs when using a mixture of enzyme preparations in mixed feeds. Bulletin of Sumy NAU. 2014; (2):152—156. (In Russ.).
  7. Nekrasov R, Chabaev M, Zelenchenkova A. The use of enzymes is an effective tool in feeding pigs. Pigbreeding. 2019; (6):39—40. (In Russ.).
  8. Gamko LN, Sidorov II, Talyzina TL, Chernenok YN. Probiotiki na smenu antibiotikam [Probiotics to replace antibiotics]. Bryansk.; 2015. (In Russ.).
  9. Ovchinnikov AA. Productivity of sows at the use of probiotics in the ration. Herald of Beef Cattle Breeding. 2017; (1):119—123. (In Russ.).
  10. Laptev GY, Novikova NI, Soldatov VV, Bolshakov VN, Selivanov DG. Profort in pig feeding. Agricultural news. 2019; (4):48—49. (In Russ.).
  11. Samburov NV, Trubnikov DV, Popov VS, Babaskin RN. Probiotic feed additives in technology of cultivation weaned piglets. Bulletin of the Kursk State Agricultural Academy. 2017; (2):29—34. (In Russ.).
  12. Podobed LI, Safonov AP. Nauchno-prakticheskoe rukovodstvo po optimizatsii kormleniya svinei [Scientific and practical guide to optimizing pig feeding]. Odessa: Akvatoriya publ.; 2020. (In Russ.).
  13. Shulaev GM, Milushev RK, Engovatov VF, et al. Obogatitel’naya dobavka dlya kombikormov porosyatam rannego ot"ema [Enriching additive for compound feeds for early weaned piglets]. Patent RUS, no. 2734437C1, 2020. (In Russ.).
  14. Burlakov VS. Volvak SF, Naumkin VN, Naumkina LA, Shvetsova MR, Tatyanicheva OE et al. Research of biotechnical systems in animal husbandry. Actual issues in agricultural biology. 2019; (4):94—103. (In Russ.).
  15. Belousov N. Compound feed and genetics — key factors for increasing productivity. Pigbreeding. 2018; (2):82—85. (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2021 Vorobyova N.V., Popov V.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies