Common oak survival in the forest ecosystem of the Volga-Akhtuba floodplain in the north of Astrakhan region

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Forests in our natural environment play an important role. They are a necessary natural resource and perform many functions in the forest ecosystem. As in our country, as well as abroad, due to numerous studies, the enormous role of forests in preserving the ecological balance of the environment has been confirmed. To ensure the uniqueness of the Astrakhan region, it is necessary to restore Lower Volga forests, which in turn perform significant functions, namely: influence on hydrological regime, protect soil from degradation, wind and water erosion, preserve recreational potential of the territory and provide local population with stable agricultural production. In spring and fall of 2019, employees of the Precaspian Agrarian Federal Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences planted 120 seedlings of common oak (60 plants in spring and 60 plants in autumn) in the areas located in the right bank of the Volga-Akhtuba floodplain to the south of Solenoye Zaimishche village. At the end of October 2020, 64 seedlings (53 %) of common oak survived. The best (100 %) survival rate was noted in annual seedlings, which were planted in spring at the site with shading. The greatest plant death (20 %) was in two-year-old seedlings planted in fall at sites with no shading.

Full Text

Table 1. Experimental design for common oak planting

Variants

Seedlings

Planting time

Age of seedlings

Light conditions

Spring

1 year

Shading

15

No shading

15

2 years

Shading

15

No shading

15

Fall

1 year

Shading

15

No shading

15

2 years

Shading

15

No shading

15

 

Table 2. Results of agrochemical soil analyses, Precaspian Agrarian Federal Scientific  Center of the RAS, 2019

Indices

Unit

Analysis results

Natural habitat, Vyazovka

Experimental plots, Solenoe Zaimishche

No shading

Shading

pH aqueous

pH unit

7.1

8.0

7.7

Organic substance (humus)

%

4.03

2.70

2.80

Alkaline hydrolyzable nitrogen

mg/kg

182

68

70

Mobile phosphorus

mg/kg

> 250

69

73

Mobile potassium

mg/kg

879

615

621

 

Table 3. Results of common oak spring planting, Precaspian Agrarian Federal Scientific  Center of the RAS, 2019

Planting time

Age of seedlings

Light conditions

Number of seedlings

Survival rate

plants

%

Spring

1 year

Shading

15

15

100

No shading

15

11

70

2 years

Shading

15

9

60

No shading

15

4

27

 

Table 4. Survival of common oak seedlings, Precaspian Agrarian Federal Scientific Center of the RAS, 2020

Planting time

Age of seedlings

Light conditions

Number of seedlings

Survival rate,%

planted

in October 2020

Spring

1 year

Shading

15

15

100

No shading

15

11

70

2 years

Shading

15

9

60

No shading

15

4

27

Fall

1 year

Shading

15

10

66

No shading

15

6

40

2 years

Shading

15

6

40

No shading

15

3

20

×

About the authors

Anna A. Bakaneva

Precaspian Agrarian Federal Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: solnce5508@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2619-8794

junior researcher, Department of Environmental Management

8 Severny block, Solenoye Zaymishche vil., Chernoyarsk district, Astrakhan region, 416251, Russian Federation

References

  1. Kutlusurina GV, Tokareva AA Soil-hydrological characteristics of Astrakhan region for justification of land reclamation zoning. Scientific Journal of Russian Research Institute of Land Improvement Problems. 2016; (2):128—147. (In Russ.).
  2. Rybashlykova LP, Konev SV. Ecological-geochemical state of meadow-pasture ecosystems of the Volga-Akhtuba floodplain. South of Russia: ecology, development. 2017; 12(4):185—191. (In Russ). doi: 10.18470/1992–1098–2017–4–185–191
  3. Tyutyuma NV, Tuz RK, Konev SV. Value of the Volga-Akhtuba floodplain in maintaining the sustainability of the ecological system of the Northern Caspian region. Izvestia of the Lower Volga Agro-University Complex. 2017; (1):175—181. (In Russ.).
  4. Glushko SG, Manyukova IG, Prokhorenko NB. Restoration of oak forests of the Middle Volga region. Vestnik of Omsk SAU. 2017; (3):56—61. (In Russ.).
  5. Manaenkov AS. Formation of steppe and protective afforestation: theoretical and applied aspects in the contemporary context. Vestnik of Volga State University of Technology. Series: Forest. Ecology. Nature Management. 2016; (2): 5—23. (In Russ.). doi: 10.15350/2306–2827.2016.2.5
  6. Mikhin VI, Mikhina EA. Formation of English oak protective plants in the Central Chernozem region of Russia. Forestry Engineering Journal. 2018; (4):109—117. (In Russ.). doi: 10.12737/ article_5c1a321965cf38.69751554
  7. Zvolinsky VP, Zaplavnov DM, Kishchenko AA, Koshelev AV. Influence of environmental factors on the state of forest plantations of the Volga-Akhtubinskaya floodplain of the Astrakhan region. Izvestia of the Lower Volga Agro-University Complex. 2013; (3):14—19. (In Russ.).
  8. Romanov EM, Smyshlyaeva MI, Krasnov VG, Mukhortov DI. Growing of one-year containerized seedlings of English oak (Quercus robur L.) with the use of various nutritious substrates. Vestnik of Volga State University of Technology. Series: Forest. Ecology. Nature Management. 2017; 3:26—36. (In Russ.). doi: 10.15350/2306–2827.2017.3.26
  9. Demakov YP, Krasnov VG, Kirillov SV, Smyshlyaeva MI, Antropova AV. Information content of morphometric parameters of trees, acorns and leaves of English oak (Quercus robur L.) in provenance trial plantations. Vestnik of Volga State University of Technology. Series: Forest. Ecology. Nature Management. 2015; (3):18—33. (In Russ.).
  10. Adams J, Gaddis DA, Beliech D. Growing Your Own Oak Seedlings. Available from: http://msucares. com/pubs/publications/p2421.pdf [Accessed 5th July 2021].
  11. Baranov SG. Use of MorphoJ soft package for phenotypic and genotypic variety testing (English oak case study). Russian Journal of Genetics: Applied Research. 2018; 8(1):22—30. doi: 10.1134/S2079059718010021
  12. Yuferev VG, Taranov NN. Retrospective analysis of Volga-Akhtuba floodplain forests degradation. Izvestia of the Lower Volga Agro-University Complex. 2016; (3):66—72. (In Russ.).
  13. Semenischenkov YA, Lobanov GV. Geoecological conditions of habitats of floodplain oak forests in river valleys of the Upper Dnieper basin. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg university. Earth sciences. 2019; 64(2):328—362. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21638/spbu07.2019.210
  14. Erusalimsky VI, Rozhkov VA. The multifunctional role of protective forest plantations. Dokuchaev Soil Bulletin. 2017; (88):121—137. (In Russ.). doi: 10.19047 / 0136–1694–2017–88–121–137
  15. Macdonald SE, Landhäusser SM, Skousen J, Franklin J, Frouz J, Hall S, et al. Forest restoration following surface mining disturbance: challenges and solutions. New Forests. 2015; 46(5—6):703—732. doi: 10.1007/ s11056–015–9506–4

Copyright (c) 2021 Bakaneva A.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies