Survival of forest strips in ash and slag dump territory of Chita combined heat and power plant

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

This article is a continuation of research on creation of forest protective strips on the territory of sanitary protection zone with intensive influence of ash and slag dump of the Chita CHPP-1 (TGC-14). Earlier (2017-2019), plantings were made focused on reducing atmospheric pollution, improving soil properties, regulating surface runoff that prevents erosion, fixing ground cover, reducing wind speed and retaining small solid particles. The aim of the research was to analyze survival rate and health of woody and shrubby plant species in protective forest strips; to obtain linear indicators of plant growth and development in experimental plots. In the course of the research, it was found that the overall survival of plants in the experimental plots differed by year. Survival rate of woody and shrubby plant species also differed. Larix gmelinii, Betula pendula, Hippophae rhamnoides, Crataegus sanguinea, Caragana spinosa and Elaeagnus commutata had the highest survival rate in the experiment. The survival of shrubs was generally better than that of trees. Among shrub species, Caragana spinosa (92 and 81 %) and Elaeagnus commutata (95 and 86 %) were characterized by good survival in plantings in 2017 and 2018, respectively. Rosa acicularis (20 %), Spiraea media and Sorbaria sorbifolia (28 %) showed low survival in 2019. The plant survival varies significantly depending on the planting season, types of seedlings and planting technology. The use of planting material (wildfowl) with a large earthen lump increases plant survival in forest protection strips. Unfavorable factors that have a negative impact on the transplanted plants are man-made landscapes, harmful atmospheric impurities from the ash and slag dump. Moreover, competitive relations with herbaceous plants, intensive grazing of animals, insect and disease damage have an additional impact. For healthy growth of plants, it is necessary to perform care for plantings, and organizational measures (fencing of experimental plots with signal tapes). It is important to continue observations and repeat plantings to clarify the adaptive ability of plant species grown in protective plantings, improve planting technology.

Full Text

 

Fig. 1. Modeling the distribution of tree and shrub species in forest strips

 

Fig. 2. Plant survival rate in 2017—2019

 

Table 1. Plant survival in forest strips for the study period (autumn 2020)

Species

Year of planting

Survival rate,%

Average height, m

Average crown diameter, cm

Vitality, score

Main tree species

Betula pendula

2018

2019

64

4

0.65

0.35

35

21

3

1

Larix gmelinii

2017

2018

2019

82

58

0

1.07

0.85

59

48

4

3

1

Pinus sylvestris

2017

2018

2019

58

10

52

0.88 0.65

0.63

39

50

29

3

2

3

Accompanying species

Populus tremula

2019

12

1.38

62

1

Crataegus sanguinea

2017

2018

92

74

0.57

0.64

24

36

4

3

Crataegus pinnatifida

2017

40

0.86

54

2

Hippophae rhamnoides

2017

79

0.87

65

3

Malus baccata

2017

2018

2019

94

52

23

0.65 0.45

1.02

26

16

39

4

3

2

Shrubs

Caragana arborescens

2017

85

0.80

41

4

Caragana spinosa

2017

2018

92

81

0.69

0.79

24

33

4

4

Elaeagnus commutata

2017

2018

95

86

0.56

0.48

18

24

4

4

Sorbaria sorbifolia

2019

28

0.80

35

2

Spiraea media

2019

28

0.43

32

2

Rosa acicularis

2019

20

0.36

30

2

 

Fig. 3. The vital state of forest strips planted in 2017—2019

 

×

About the authors

Ekaterina A. Banshchikova

Institute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Cryology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: kait1986@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7206-4893

Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Geography and Regional Nature Management

16a Nedorezova st., Chita, Zabaykalsky Krai, 672014, Russian Federation

Tatiana V. Zhelibo

Institute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Cryology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: zhelibo@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4444-2463

PhD student, Engineer, Laboratory of Geography and Regional Nature Management

16a Nedorezova st., Chita, Zabaykalsky Krai, 672014, Russian Federation

Vladimir P. Makarov

Institute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Cryology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: vm2853@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4885-0752

Candidate of Biological Sciences, Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Geography and Regional Nature Management

16a Nedorezova st., Chita, Zabaykalsky Krai, 672014, Russian Federation

Vyacheslav S. Larin

Institute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Cryology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: larvecheslav@yandex.ru

Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Geography and Regional Nature Management

16a Nedorezova st., Chita, Zabaykalsky Krai, 672014, Russian Federation

References

  1. Belyuchenko IS. Windbreaks as a factor of improving agricultural lands and enhance their local biodiversity. The North Caucasus Ecological Herald. 2019; 15(3):42—54. (In Russ.).
  2. Varaksin GS, Lobanov AI, Shangova OG, Varaksina SG. Forest belt stability on the arable lands in the Tyva Republic steppe conditions. Bulletin of KrasSAU. 2011;(6):94—97. (In Russ.).
  3. Evdokimov IV, Khaidukova IA, Karbasnikova EB. Comparative assessment of the growth of European spruce forest crops grown under different technologies. Symbol of Science. 2018;(9):8—11. (In Russ.).
  4. Chegodaeva ND, Lysenkov EV, Kargin VI, Perov NA. The effectiveness of agro-resource potential in the fields protected by forest belts. Achievements of Science and Technology in Agro-industrial Complex. 2007; (9):47. (In Russ.).
  5. Cheplyanskiy IY, Zasoba VV, Popovichev VV. Forest and non-forest lands in the state of protective forest strips in Russia. Aktual’nye problemy lesnogo kompleksa. 2018; (51):91—95. (In Russ.).
  6. Itigilova MT, Chechel AP, Zamana LV, Strizhova TA, Kotelnikov AM, Bybin FF, et al. Ekologiya gorodskogo vodoema [Ecology of the urban reservoir]. Novosibirsk: SO RAN publ.; 1998. (In Russ.).
  7. Usmanova LI, Usmanov MT. Influence of ash dumps of Chita CHPP-1 and CHPP-2 on natural waters of adjacent territories. Bulletin of Kamchatka Regional Association «Educational-Scientific Center». Earth sciences. 2010;(2):167—178. (In Russ.).
  8. Tsybekmitova GT, Kuklin AP, Tashlykova NA, Afonina EY, Bazarova BB, Itigilova MT, et al. Ecological state of lake Kenon as a cooling pond of the thermal power plant-1 (TPP-1) (Zabaykalsky Krai). Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2017; 7(3):194—209. (In Russ.). doi: 10.15293/2226–3365.1703.12
  9. Chechel AP. Problems of protection and rational use of lakes — coolers of thermal power plants (on the example of the lake of Kenon of Zabaykalsky Krai). International journal of applied and fundamental research. 2018; (5—1):199—203. (In Russ.).
  10. Pak LN, Teplyakov IG, Bekish AY. Optimal ways to reduce the negative load on the environment from the ash dump of a JSC «TGK-14». Aspirant. Prilozhenie k zhurnalu Vestnik Zabaikal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2018; 12(2):66—69. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21209/2074–9155–2018–12–2–66–69
  11. Banshchikova EA, Zhelibo TV, Mironov AV, Vakhnina IL, Makarov VP, Gorbunov IV. On the formation of protective forested tract in the district of ash dump of Chita central heating and power plant-1. Notes of the Transbaikal Branch of the Russian Geographical Society. 2019; (136):126—135. (In Russ.).
  12. Bobrinev VP. Vyrashchivanie lesnykh polos v Vostochnom Zabaikal’e [Cultivation of forest strips in Eastern Transbaikalia]. Chita: Obl. tipografiya publ.; 1992. (In Russ.).
  13. Pak LN, Bobrinev VP, Usmanova LI. The lake Kenon: Status, forest reclamation of the basin. International journal of applied and fundamental research. 2014; (11—4):626—629. (In Russ.).
  14. Pak LN, Bobrinev VP. The timing of planting trees in the forest area of Transbaikalian edge. International journal of applied and fundamental research. 2014; (5—1):75—78. (In Russ.).
  15. Romanov NV. Defensive forest bands — edificator landscape element. Byulleten’ Samarskaya Luka. 2004; (15):175—184. (In Russ.).
  16. Alekhin VV, Syreishchikov DP. Metodika polevykh botanicheskikh issledovanii [Methodology of field botanical research]. Vologda: Severnyi pechatnik publ.; 1926. (In Russ.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. Fig. 1. Modeling the distribution of tree and shrub species in forest strips

Download (100KB)
2. Fig. 2. Plant survival rate in 2017—2019

Download (70KB)
3. Fig. 3. The vital state of forest strips planted in 2017—2019

Download (95KB)

Copyright (c) 2021 Banshchikova E.A., Zhelibo T.V., Makarov V.P., Larin V.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies