The content of heavy metals in the raw materials of some representatives of the genus Paeonia L. in an urbanized environment
- Authors: Reut A.A.1, Denisova S.G.1
-
Affiliations:
- South-Ural Botanical Garden-Institute of Ufa Federal Research Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 16, No 4 (2021)
- Pages: 337-352
- Section: Plant protection
- URL: https://agrojournal.rudn.ru/agronomy/article/view/19701
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-797X-2021-16-4-337-352
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
At present, heavy metals are generally recognized as priority soil pollutants, while the most active pollutants are their mobile forms, which can pass from solid phases into soil solutions and be absorbed by plants. It is known that the vegetative mass of agricultural crops is capable of accumulating large amounts of heavy metals. Ornamental flower crops, which firmly occupy their ecological niche, are practically not considered from this point of view. The aim of this work was to study the features of the accumulation of heavy metals in the aboveground and underground organs of some representatives of the genus Paeonia L. in the urbanized environment of the city of Ufa. The objects of research were four species ( P. peregrina Mill., P. lactiflora Pall., P. lactiflora f. rosea, P. delavayi Franch.) (Family Paeoniaceae Rudolphi) and three varieties of hybrid peony (‘Appassionata’, ‘Mustai Karim’, ‘Jeanne d’Arc’). The study of the elemental composition of the aboveground and underground parts was carried out according to the method «Determination of As, Pb, Cd, Sn, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn and Ni in samples of food products and food raw materials by the atomic absorption method with electrothermal atomization». Mathematical data processing was carried out using generally accepted methods of variation statistics using the AgCStat software package in the form of an Excel add-in. Eight element studies are presented for each raw material group. Quantitative indicators of elements are given in mmol/kg of air-dry raw materials. It was revealed that in the studied samples the copper content was 4.15…2520.00 times higher than that of other elements. The minimum concentrations of arsenic (0.0035…0.0064 mmol/kg), chromium (0.0019…0.0046 mmol/ kg), manganese (0.0174…0.0219 mmol/ kg) and iron (0.0059…0.0125 mmol/ kg) were noted in the roots; lead (0.003…0.037 mmol/kg), cadmium (0.0002…0.001 mmol/kg) and copper (0.1477…0.2134 mmol/kg) - in the leaves; nickel (0.0082…0.0179 mmol/kg) - in the flowers of the studied paeonies. The maximum content of arsenic (0.0062…0.0123 mmol/kg) and chromium (0.0028…0.0063 mmol/kg) was found in the leaves; lead (0.0027…0.0223 mmol/kg), nickel (0.0167…0.0209 mmol/kg), manganese (0.0173…0.0212 mmol/kg) and iron (0.0087…0.0138 mmol/kg) - in stems; cadmium (0.0002…0.0009 mmol/kg) and copper (0.144…0.244 mmol/kg) - in flowers. Therefore, cutting paeonies in the autumn before retirement avoids the accumulation of these microelements in the soil. The results of the correlation analysis showed that the absolute values of the concentrations of the studied elements in the considered taxon of paeonies correlate with each other to a moderate and strong degree.
Full Text
Table 1. The content of heavy metals in flowers of some taxon of the genus Paeonia, mmol/kg
Table 2. The content of heavy metals in the leaves of some taxon of the genus Paeonia, mmol/kg
Table 3. The content of heavy metals in the stems of some taxon of the genus Paeonia, mmol/kg
Table 4. The content of heavy metals in the roots of some taxon of the genus Paeonia, mmol/kg
Table 5. Results of two-factor analysis of variance of the elemental composition of paeonies
The elements | Sources of variation | SS | Df | ms | Ffact | Share,% |
Arsenic (As) | General | 34.57 | 83.00 | — | — | — |
Taxon (A) | 7.74 | 6.00 | 1.29 | 1605.87 | 22.39 | |
Part of the plant (B) | 11.48 | 3.00 | 3.83 | 4764.83 | 33.22 | |
Interaction (AB) | 15.30 | 18.00 | 0.85 | 1057.89 | 44.26 | |
Random | 0.04 | 54.00 | 0.0008 | — | — | |
Lead (Pb) | General | 30.67 | 83.00 | — | — | — |
Taxon (A) | 9.21 | 6.00 | 1.53 | 5353.04 | 30.01 | |
Part of the plant (B) | 5.74 | 3.00 | 1.91 | 6678.85 | 18.72 | |
Interaction (AB) | 15.71 | 18.00 | 0.87 | 3044.60 | 51.21 | |
Random | 0.02 | 54.00 | 0.0003 | — | — | |
Cadmium (Cd) | General | 36.95 | 83.00 | — | — | — |
Taxon (A) | 21.32 | 6.00 | 3.55 | 51.83 | 57.71 | |
Part of the plant (B) | 5.49 | 3.00 | 1.83 | 26.71 | 14.87 | |
Interaction (AB) | 6.32 | 18.00 | 0.35 | 5.12 | 17.11 | |
Random | 3.70 | 54.00 | 0.0686 | — | — | |
Chromium (Cr) | General | 10.06 | 83.00 | — | — | — |
Taxon (A) | 5.68 | 6.00 | 0.95 | 709.62 | 56.45 | |
Part of the plant (B) | 1.36 | 3.00 | 0.45 | 339.60 | 13.51 | |
Interaction (AB) | 2.94 | 18.00 | 0.16 | 122.48 | 29.23 | |
Random | 0.072 | 54.00 | 0.00133 | — | — | |
Copper (Cu) | General | 2.68 | 83.00 | — | — | — |
Taxon (A) | 1.18 | 6.00 | 0.20 | 668.02 | 44.19 | |
Part of the plant (B) | 0.25 | 3.00 | 0.08 | 277.82 | 9.19 | |
Interaction (AB) | 1.23 | 18.00 | 0.07 | 231.78 | 46.00 | |
Random | 0.016 | 54.00 | 0.00030 | — | — | |
Nickel (Ni) | General | 5.48 | 83.00 | — | — | — |
Taxon (A) | 1.66 | 6.00 | 0.28 | 421.16 | 30.25 | |
Part of the plant (B) | 1.53 | 3.00 | 0.51 | 777.33 | 27.92 | |
Interaction (AB) | 2.25 | 18.00 | 0.13 | 191.00 | 41.16 | |
Random | 0.035 | 54.00 | 0.00066 | — | — | |
Manganese (Mn) | General | 0.50 | 83.00 | — | — | — |
Taxon (A) | 0.35 | 6.00 | 0.06 | 836.37 | 70.83 | |
Part of the plant (B) | 0.01 | 3.00 | 0.00 | 55.97 | 2.37 | |
Interaction (AB) | 0.13 | 18.00 | 0.01 | 102.48 | 26.04 | |
Random | 0.004 | 54.00 | 0.00007 | — | — | |
Iron (Fe) | General | 2.95 | 83.00 | — | — | — |
Taxon (A) | 0.43 | 6.00 | 0.07 | 21.20 | 14.43 | |
Part of the plant (B) | 0.30 | 3.00 | 0.10 | 30.25 | 10.30 | |
Interaction (AB) | 2.03 | 18.00 | 0.11 | 33.73 | 68.87 | |
Random | 0.181 | 54.00 | 0.00335 | — | — |
Table 6. Correlation matrix of the content of elements in flowers of paeony
Indicators | As | Pb | Cd | Cr | Cu | Ni | Mn | Fe |
As | 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pb | –0.49* | 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cd | 0.63** | –0.03 | 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cr | –0.05 | –0.26 | –0.61** | 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
Cu | 0.09 | –0.48* | –0.41 | 0.78** | 1.00 |
|
|
|
Ni | 0.32 | –0.32 | 0.50* | –0.63** | –0.66** | 1.00 |
|
|
Mn | –0.65** | 0.15 | –0.36 | 0.33 | 0.16 | –0.29 | 1.00 |
|
Fe | 0.21 | –0.60** | 0.25 | –0.34 | –0.31 | 0.84** | 0.04 | 1.00 |
Note. * — significant at the 5 % level; ** — significant at the 1 % level; the absence of the * indicates the insignificance of the coefficient.
Table 7. Correlation matrix of the content of elements in leaves of paeony
Indicators | As | Pb | Cd | Cr | Cu | Ni | Mn | Fe |
As | 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pb | –0.34 | 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cd | 0.38 | –0.18 | 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cr | –0.66** | 0.65** | –0.02 | 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
Cu | –0.14 | –0.09 | –0.14 | –0.27 | 1.00 |
|
|
|
Ni | –0.02 | –0.03 | –0.10 | –0.27 | 0.17 | 1.00 |
|
|
Mn | –0.39 | 0.29 | 0.08 | 0.40 | 0.53* | –0.01 | 1.00 |
|
Fe | 0.30 | –0.13 | –0.20 | 0.02 | –0.78** | –0.14 | –0.47* | 1.00 |
Note. * — significant at the 5 % level; ** — significant at the 1 % level; the absence of the * indicates the insignificance of the coefficient.
Table 8. Correlation matrix of the content of elements in stems of paeony
Indicators | As | Pb | Cd | Cr | Cu | Ni | Mn | Fe |
As | 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pb | 0.74** | 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cd | 0.62** | 0.77** | 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cr | –0.83** | –0.60** | –0.32 | 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
Cu | –0.03 | 0.27 | 0.64** | 0.12 | 1.00 |
|
|
|
Ni | –0.13 | –0.05 | –0.04 | –0.00 | 0.26 | 1.00 |
|
|
Mn | –0.38 | –0.22 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 0.66** | 0.13 | 1.00 |
|
Fe | –0.20 | –0.08 | –0.20 | 0.38 | –0.08 | –0.06 | 0.10 | 1.00 |
Note. * — significant at the 5 % level; ** — significant at the 1 % level; the absence of the * indicates the insignificance of the coefficient.
Table 9. Correlation matrix of the content of elements in roots of paeony
Indicators | As | Pb | Cd | Cr | Cu | Ni | Mn | Fe |
As | 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pb | 0.39 | 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cd | 0.02 | 0.48* | 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cr | –0.26 | –0.64** | –0.33 | 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
Cu | –0.25 | –0.17 | –0.28 | 0.61** | 1.00 |
|
|
|
Ni | 0.08 | –0.08 | –0.13 | –0.43* | –0.04 | 1.00 |
|
|
Mn | –0.64** | –0.19 | –0.07 | 0.35 | 0.62** | –0.04 | 1.00 |
|
Fe | –0.19 | –0.27 | –0.06 | 0.80** | 0.52* | –0.35 | 0.26 | 1.00 |
Note. * — significant at the 5 % level; ** — significant at the 1 % level; the absence of the * indicates the insignificance of the coefficient.
About the authors
Antonina A. Reut
South-Ural Botanical Garden-Institute of Ufa Federal Research Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: cvetok.79@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4809-6449
Candidate of Biological Sciences, Leading Researcher, Laboratory for the Introduction and Selection of Floral Plants
195/3 Mendeleev st., Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, 450080, Russian FederationSvetlana G. Denisova
South-Ural Botanical Garden-Institute of Ufa Federal Research Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: svetik-7808@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9005-9377
Candidate of Biological Sciences, Senior Researcher, Laboratory for the Introduction and Selection of Floral Plants
195/3 Mendeleev st., Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, 450080, Russian FederationReferences
- Sedelnikova LL, Chankina OV. The content of heavy metals in the vegetative organs of Hemerocallis hybrida in urban environment. Bulletin of KSAU. 2016; (2):34—43. (In Russ.).
- Mihalchuk NV. Heavy metals and microelements in background soils and agricultural landscapes in southwestern Belarus. Agroekologіcal journal. 2017; (3):27—31. (In Russ.).
- Ilinskiy AV. Analysis of biological absorption coefficients of heavy metals for fodder beet. Eurasian Union of Scientists. 2020; (2—6):9—12. (In Russ.). doi: 10.31618/ESU.2413-9335.2020.6.71.612
- Mazhaysky YA, Galchenko SV, Guseva TM, Cherdakova AS. Accumulation of heavy metals by decorative flower crops. Success of modern science and education. 2016; 3(9):203—205. (In Russ.).
- Elagina DS, Arkhipova NS, Sibgatullina MS. Study of the features of the accumulation of heavy metals in Amaranthus retroflexus L. In: Young scientists and pharmacy of the XXI century: conference proceedings. Moscow: Nauka publ.; 2016. p.189—195. (In Russ.).
- Mironova LN, Reut AA. Piony. Kollekcii botanicheskogo sada-instituta Ufimskogo nauchnogo centra RAN [Peonies. Collections of the Botanical Garden-Institute of the Ufa Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Ufa: Bashk. entsikl. publ.; 2017. (In Russ.).
- Reut AA, Mironova LN. Rare species of the genus Paeonia L. cultivated in the Bashkir Urals region. Agrarian Russia. 2018; (2):30—34. (In Russ.).
- Abramova LM, Anishhenko IE, Vafin RV, Golovanov YM, Zhigunov OY, Zaripova AA, et al. Rastenija Juzhno-Ural’skogo botanicheskogo sada-instituta UFIC RAN [Plants of the South Ural Botanical Garden-Institute of the Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Ufa: Mir pechati publ.; 2019. (In Russ.).
- Fotev YV, Shevchuk OM, Syso AI. Variability of macroand microelement composition of accessions of Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. in the south of western Siberia and in the Crimea. Chemistry of plant raw material. 2021; (2):217—226. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14258/JCPRM.2021027543
- Reut AA, Biglova AR, Allayarova IN. Comparative analysis of the chemical composition of plant materials of some representatives of the genera Narcissus L. and Camassia Lindl. Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. 2021; (2):79—90. (In Russ.). doi: 10.32417/1997-4868-2021-205-02-79-90
- Simonova OA, Simonov MV, Tovstik EV. Varietal features of bioaccumulation of iron in barley plants. Taurida herald of the agrarian sciences. 2020; (3):142—150. (In Russ.). doi: 10.33952/2542-0720-2020-3-23142-151
- Gonchar-Zaykin PP, Chertov VG. Excel add-in for statistical evaluation and analysis of the results of field and laboratory experiments. In: Development of adaptive systems of environmental protection technologies for agricultural products in arid regions of Russia: conference proceedings. Moscow; 2003. p.559—565. (In Russ.).
- Chekin GV, Nikiforov VM. Development of the root system of spring wheat at the early stages of ontogenesis during pre-sowing treatment of seeds with chelate products. In: Bukhtoyarov NI, Derkanosova NM, Gulevsky VA. (eds.) Current problems of agrotechnologies of the XXI century and concepts of their sustainable development: conference proceedings. Voronezh; 2016. p.34—38. (In Russ.).
- Nesterov MI, Krivohizhina LV, Ermolaeva EN, Kantyukov SA. The influence duration and degree blood loss on triglycerides, phospholipids, total cholesterol, cholesterol in lipoproteins. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2016; (6):101. (In Russ.).
- Budko EV, Yampolskiy LM, Zhukov IM, Chernikova DA. Concentration correlations of the elemental organization of hemostatic plants. International journal of applied and fundamental research. 2018; (7):95—100. (In Russ.).
- Zakharov VG, Mishenkina OG. Adaptive properties of new oat varieties in the Middle Volga region. Vestnik of Ulyanovsk state agricultural academy. 2020; (4):100—107. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18286/1816-45012020-4-100-107
Supplementary files
There are no supplementary files to display.