Morphometric and chemical parameters of hen carcasses of ‘Smena 9’ cross raised under different conditions

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Changes in live weight, morphology of carcasses, their morphometric parameters, chemical composition of muscles during cage rising (group 1) and ground-grazing raising (group 2) were studied in hens (‘Smena 9’ cross) at the age of 1, 35, 42, 49 and 56 days. Generally accepted research methods were used. The hens were raised under the same conditions. The experiments revealed that chickens had a high growth rate at an early age. At 56-day age, live weight of hen from group 1 was 3438 g, which was 2.69 % less than in group 2, and carcass weight was 2.89 % less (P < 0.05). In carcasses of broilers from group 2, weight of muscle tissue was 3.14 % more (P > 0.05), however, fat and bones were less by 0.22 and 0.09 %, respectively. Compared to 1-day-old chickens, 56-day-old broilers had increased relative weight: muscle tissue in group 1 and group 2 - by 13.04 and 13.27 %, respectively; fat - by 4.02 and 3.80 %, respectively; while relative bone weight decreased by 16.25 and 16.34 % in group 1 and group 2, respectively. Ground-grazing raising of chickens is not inferior in meat productivity to cage rising. At the same time, veterinary and sanitary indicators differ in the quality of meat.

Full Text

Table 1
Dynamics of live weight, carcass weight and relative carcass  tissue weight (n = 4 for each group)

Indicator

Age, days  

1

35

42

49

56

 Cage rising (group 1)  

Live weight, g

43.0 ± 0.5

2079 ± 27.2

2573 ± 34.6

3035 ± 40.4

3438 ± 49.8

Weight of gutted carcass, g

16.81 ± 0.25

1500 ± 21.6

1897 ± 28.5

2255  ±  37.9

2560 ± 45.7

 Relative weight, % of carcass weight  

Muscles

53.13

64.07

65.42

66.03

66.17

Fat

1.60

2.16

3.06

4.02

Other tissues

14.22

12.27

13.18

13.35

13.40

Bones

32.66

22.07

19.24

17.56

16.41

 Ground- grazing rising (group 2)  

Live weight, g

43.0 ± 0.5

1987 ± 26.4

2548 ± 37.6

3097 ± 46.5

3536 ± 58.7

Weight of gutted carcass, g

16.81 ± 0.25

1434 ± 17.4

1878 ± 26.2

2300 ± 33.6

2634 ± 41.7

 Relative weight, % of carcass weight  

Muscles

53.13

64.02

65.50

66.22

66.40

Fat

1.32

1.97

2.68

3.80

Other tissues

14.22

12.55

13.26

13.52

13.47

Bones

32.66

22.11

19.28

17.57

16.32

 

Table 2
Chemical parameters of superficial pectoral muscles of broiler hens (‘Smena 9’ cross)

Age, days

Raising method

Content, %

Total carcass fat, %

Water

Fat

Protein

1

Hatched

80.51

0.56

17.10

42

Cage raising

74.96

1.12

22.74

2.16

42

Ground- grazing raising

75.12

1.15

22.85

1.97

49

Cage raising

74.50

1.20

23.23

3.06

49

Ground-grazing raising

74.57

1.23

23.30

2.68

56

Cage raising

73.75

1.24

23.84

4.02

56

Ground-grazing raising

73.84

1.26

23.97

3.80

 

×

About the authors

Ksenia M. Kondrashkina

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: skm9710@yahoo.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8282-2734

postgraduate student, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Agrarian and Technological Institute

8/2 Miklukho-Maklaya st., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation

Dmitry V. Nikitchenko

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Email: dvnikitchenko@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0531-0377

Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Agrarian and Technological Institute

8/2 Miklukho-Maklaya st., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation

Vladimir E. Nikitchenko

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Email: v.e.nikitchenko@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6542-5673

Doctor of Veterinary Sciences, Professor, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Agrarian and Technological Institute

8/2 Miklukho-Maklaya st., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation

References

  1. Efimov DN, Egorova AV, Emanuilova ZV, et al. Rukovodstvo po rabote s ptitsei myasnogo krossa ‘Smena 9’ s autoseksnoi materinskoi roditel’skoi formoi [The guide to work with birds of meat cross ‘Change 9’ with an autosex maternal parent form. Sergiev Posad; 2021. (In Russ.).
  2. Zagorskaya V. Broiler: on the floor or in the cage? Sfera: Ptitseprom. 2017;(1):9–15. (In Russ.).
  3. Lukashenko VS, Ovseychik EA, Komarov AA. Meat yields and quality in broilers as affected by rearing system. Ptitsevodstvo. 2020;(3):40–43. (In Russ.). doi: 10.33845/0033-3239-2020-69-3-40-43
  4. European convection on the protection of vertebrates used for experiments or scientific research. ETS No. 123. Strasbourg, 1986.
  5. Nikitchenko DV, Nikitchenko VE, Kondrashkina KM, Panakhova SO, Robletchikova MS. Broiler myopathies in poultry industry (the review). Poultry and chicken products. 2022;(3):60–64. (In Russ.). doi: 10.30975/2073-4999-2022-24-3-60-64
  6. Seregin IG, Baranovich ES, Nikitchenko VE, Nikitchenko DV, Kozak YA. Changes in broiler and hog meat with PSE defect signs. Poultry and chicken products. 2020;(4):30–33. (In Russ.). doi: 10.30975/2073-4999-2020-22-4-30-33
  7. Barbut S. The Science of Poultry and Meat Processing. Chapter 3: Structure and Muscle Physiology. 2015. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10214/9300 [Accessed 20th January 2023].
  8. Lukashenko VS, Ovsechik EA, Okuneva TS. The productive performance in free-range broilers. Veterinary, Zootechnics and Biotechnology. 2019;(6):60–64. (In Russ.). doi: 10.26155/vet.zoo.bio.201906009
  9. Vatnikov Y, Yousfi M, Engashev S, Rudenko P, Lutsay V, Kulikov E, et al. Clinical and hematological parameters for selecting the optimal dose of the phytopreparation «deprimˮ, containing an extract of the herb Hypericum perforatum L., in husbandry. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2020;12(Suppl. 1):2731–2742. doi: 10.31838/ijpr/2020.SP1.401
  10. Astrakhantsev AA. The productive performance in broiler chicks in different production systems. Ptitsevodstvo. 2019;(1):26–30. (In Russ.). doi: 10.33845/0033-3239-2019-68-1-26-30
  11. Rozhentsov AL, Smolentsev SY. Performance of technologies of breeding broiler chickens of various crosses. Veterinarny Vrach. 2019;(1):55–59. (In Russ.). doi: 10.33632/1998-698x.2019-1-55-59
  12. Kavtarashvili AS, Buyarov VS. Modern systems for containing chickens-broilers: domestic and world experience. Biology in Agriculture. 2021;(2):13–17. (In Russ.).
  13. Ovchinnikova AA, Bychaev AG. Creation of broilers for farm and households. The role of young scientists and researchers in solving urgent problems of the agricultural sector: conference proceedings. Saint Petersburg; 2019. p.105—-108. (In Russ.).
  14. Fisinin VI, Stollar TA, Buyarov VS. Innovative processes and technologies in meat poultry farming. Bulletin of agrarian science. 2007;(1):6–13. (In Russ.).
  15. Fisinin VI. Mirovoe i rossiiskoe proizvodstvo: realii i vyzovy budushchego [World and Russian production: realities and challenges of the future]. Sergiev Posad: Khlebprodinform publ.; 2019. (In Russ.).
  16. Szőllősi L, Béres E, Szűcs I. Effects of modern technology on broiler chicken performance and economic indicators — a Hungarian case study. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2021;20(1):188–194. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2021.1877575
  17. Rudenko PA, Vatnikov YA, Rudenko AA, Rudenko VB. Epizootic analysis of factor-infected cattle farms. Scientific life. 2020;15(4):572–585. (In Russ.). doi: 10.35679/1991-9476-2020-15-4-472-585
  18. Vatnikov Y, Donnik I, Kulikov E, Karamyan A, Sachivkina N, Rudenko P, et al. Research on the antibacterial and antimycotic effect of the phytopreparation Farnesol on biofilm-forming microorganisms in veterinary medicine. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2020;12(Suppl. 2):1481–1492. (In Russ.). doi: 10.31838/ijpr/2020.SP2.164
  19. Nikitchenko DV, Nikitchenko VE, Sevastyanov NN. Meat productivity of broiler cockerels of cross ‘Smena 8’. Theoretical and applied problems of agro-industry. 2015;(1):30–32. (In Russ.).
  20. Nikitchenko VE, Nikitchenko DV, Plyuschikov VG, Seregin IG, Nikishov AA, Rystsova EO. Effect of complex phytobiotics on morphochemical characteristics of cobb 500 cross mail broiler chicks. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2019;25(3):558–563.
  21. Evaris EF, Franco LS, Castro CS. Slow-growing male chickens fit poultry production systems with outdoor access. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 2019;75(3):429–444. doi: 10.1017/S0043933919000400
  22. Devatkal SK, Vishnuraj MR, Kulkarni VV, Kotaiah T. Carcass and meat quality characterization of indigenous and improved variety genotypes. Poultry Science. 2018;97(8):2947–2956. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey108
  23. Devatkal SK, Naveena BM, Kotaiah T. Quality, composition, and con-sumer evaluation of meat from slow-growing broilers relating to commercial broilers. Poultry Science. 2019;98(11):6177–6186. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez344

Copyright (c) 2023 Kondrashkina K.M., Nikitchenko D.V., Nikitchenko V.E.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies