Вiotechnological approaches to reduce biogenic risks in crop production: potato case

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The article presents an overview of the biogenic agro-ecological risks in crop production, to reduce which it is possible to use biotechnological approaches. Ways to reduce the negative impact of the two most common harmful objects, the сolorado potato beetle ( Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) and phytophthoras ( Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) De Bary), which lead to significant losses of potato yield, are considered. It is shown that the currently used methods of plant cell engineering (somatic hybridization and microclonal reproduction) are environmentally sound biotechnological methods of controlling black eye rot potato. The need to develop genetically engineered methods is associated with an exacerbation of biogenic agroecological risks, the reduction of which is an important approach is a proactive introgressive breeding strategy based on cell engineering and molecular methods.

About the authors

Svetlana Mikhailovna Lenivko

Brest State A.S. Pushkin University

Author for correspondence.
Email: lenivko@brsu.brest.by

Candidate of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Zoology and Genetics

Brest, Republic of Belarus

Vladimir Ivanovich Boyko

Brest State A.S. Pushkin University

Email: boikobio@yandex.by

Candidate of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Botany and Ecology

Brest, Republic of Belarus

References

  1. BELSTAT. Available from: http://www.belstat.gov.by/ofitsialnaya-statistika/ [Accessed 1st August 2019].
  2. FAOSTAT. Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/ru/#data/QC [Accessed 29th October 2019].
  3. Khavkin EE. Resistance of potatoes to black eye rot by view of molecular biotechnologist. In: Kharchenko PN. (ed.) Problemy agrobiotekhnologii [Problems of agrobiotechnology]. Moscow: VNIISB Publ.; 2012. p. 69-92. (In Russ).
  4. Dyakov YT, Elanskiy SN. Population genetics Phytophthora infestans. In: Dyakov YT, Sergeeva YV. (ed.) Mikologiya segodnya [Mycology today]. Moscow: National Mycology Academy Publ.; 2007. 1:107-139. (In Russ).
  5. Chashinskiy AV. Mexican varieties S. stoloniferum and S. polytrichon for creation of initial material resistant to black eye rot. In: Turko SA. (ed.) Kartofelevodstvo [Potato Growing]. Minsk: Research and Practical Centre of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus for Potato, Fruit and Vegetable Growing; 2015. 23:56-68. (In Russ).
  6. Fadina OA, Beketova MP, Sokolova EA, Kuznetsova MA, Smetanina TI, Rogozina EV, Khavkin EE. Anticipatory breeding: molecular markers as a tool in developing donors of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) late blight resistance from complex interspecific hybrids. Agricultural Biology.2017; 52(1):84-94. (In Russ). doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2017.1.84rus
  7. Yakovleva GA. Somatic hybridization and cell selection of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). In: Kilchevskij AV, Khotyleva LV. (ed.) Biotekhnologiya v selektsii rastenii. Kletochnaya inzheneriya [Biotechnology in plant breeding. Cell engineering]. Minsk: Belorusskaya nauka Publ.; 2012. 3:217-250. (In Russ).
  8. Yakovleva GA, Semanyuk TV, Kondratyuk AV, Bashko DV, Rodkina IA. Genital breeding of somatic hybrids and new potatoes initial forms creation. In: Turko SA. (ed.) Kartofelevodstvo [Potato Growing]. Minsk: Research and Practical Centre of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus for Potato, Fruit and Vegetable Growing; 2017. 25:94-104. (In Russ).
  9. Jacobsen E, Schouten HJ. Cisgenesis, a new tool for traditional plant breeding, should be exempted from the regulation on genetically modified organisms in a step by step approach. Potato Research. 2008; 51:75-88. doi: 10.1007/s11540-008-9097-y
  10. Yankovskaya EN, Vojtka DV, Brechko EV, Elisovetskaya DS, Nastas TN. Ontogenetic peculiarities of colorado potato beetle susceptibility to bio-preparation and plant extracts. In: Turko SA. (ed.) Kartofelevodstvo [Potato Growing]. Minsk: Research and Practical Centre of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus for Potato, Fruit and Vegetable Growing; 2014; 22:78-88. (In Russ).
  11. Perlak FJ, Stone TB, Muskopf YM, Petersen LJ, Parker GB, McPherson SA, Wyman J, Love S, Reed G, Biever D, Fischhoff DA. Genetically improved potatoes: protection from damage by colorado potato beetles. Plant Molecular Biology. 1993; 22(2):313-321. doi: 10.1007/BF00014938
  12. James C, Krattiger AF. Global Review of the Field Testing and Commercialization of Transgenic Plants, 1986 to 1995: The First Decade of Crop Biotechnology. ISAAA Briefs No 1. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA; 1996.
  13. ISAAA. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2016. ISAAA Brief No. 52. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA; 2016.
  14. Mozgova GV. Otsenka riskov vozdeistviya GMO na sokhranenie I ustoichivoe ispol'zovanie biologicheskogo raznoobraziya, s uchetom riskov dlya zdorov'ya cheloveka [Risk assessment of the impact of GMOs on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, considering risks to human health]. Minsk: Pravoiekonomika Publ.; 2014. (In Russ).

Copyright (c) 2019 Lenivko S.M., Boyko V.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies