Email this article 
State of Rosa acicularis L. coenopopulations in forest park zone of Ekaterinburg
- Authors: Tishkina E.A.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Botanical Garden of Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Ural State Forest Engineering University
- Issue: Vol 16, No 1 (2021)
- Pages: 7-17
- Section: Botany
- URL: https://agrojournal.rudn.ru/agronomy/article/view/19636
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-797X-2021-16-1-7-17
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The experiments revealed that the studied fragments of Rosa acicularis L. coenopopulation were normal and full-fledged with single-vertex ontogenetic spectra. They are able to form self-sustaining habitats for several generations and spread over a significant territory. Three periods and six ontogenetic states were distinguished in the ontogenesis of Rosa acicularis L. The age structure had three types of spectrum - left-sided, centered, and right-sided. The difference in the ontogenetic structure depends on influence of anthropogenic factor, ecological and coenotic conditions of rose habitats, and variations in climatic conditions. When analyzing the parameters of coenopopulations, we found that the best conditions for existence of Rosa acicularis L. were in the berry pine forest (FCP5) in the park named after Foresters of Russia and reed grass pine forest (FCP1) in Uktus forest park, where the habitats were characterized by high morphological indicators, numbers and high values of the pregenerative fraction.
Full Text
Table 1. Characteristics of Rosa acicularis habitats in the forest parks of Ekaterinburg
Fragment of coenopopulation (FCP) | Forest type, plant community | Tree stand | Fragments of coenopopulation (0.09 ha) | ||||||||||
Total density, plants./ha | Morphological parameters | Vitality spectrum, % | Index of vitality Ln, % | ||||||||||
Height, m | Crown projection area, m² | Volume of crown, m³ | n1 | n2 | n3 | n4 | n5 | ||||||
Compo-sition | Density of canopy | ||||||||||||
Uktus Forest Park | |||||||||||||
1 | Reed grass pine forest | 6С4Б | 0.6 | 844 | 0.81±0.03 | 0.22±0.02 | 0.06±0.01 | 20 | 63,3 | 16,7 | 0 | 0 | 83 |
2 | Reed grass pine forest | 8С2Б | 0.7 | 778 | 0.55±0.03 | 0.07±0.01 | 0.02±0 | 10 | 76,6 | 13,4 | 0 | 0 | 83 |
3 | Rocky steppe | — | — | 422 | 0.66±0.04 | 0.15±0.04 | 0.04±0.02 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 87 |
4 | Rocky steppe | — | — | 411 | 0.41±0.02 | 0.03±0 | 0.01±0 | 53.3 | 36,6 | 6,6 | 3,5 | 0 | 83 |
X ± mx | 613,7 | 0,60±0,03 | 0.11±0.01 | 0.03±0.01 | 33.3 | 56.6 | 9.1 | 0.8 | 0 | 84 | |||
Forest Park named after Foresters of Russia | |||||||||||||
5 | Berry pine forest | 10С | 0.6 | 344 | 1.29±0.10 | 0.82±0.19 | 0.49±0.17 | 43.3 | 56.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 71 |
6 | Berry pine forest | 6С4Б | 0.5 | 667 | 0.72±0.06 | 0.12±0.02 | 0.04±0.01 | 56.6 | 30 | 13.4 | 0 | 0 | 69 |
7 | Grass meadow | — | — | 444 | 1.03±0.03 | 0.18±0.01 | 0.06±0.01 | 66.6 | 23.4 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 85 |
8 | Grass pine forest | 6С4Б | 0.8 | 144 | 0.50±0.04 | 0.18±0.03 | 0.04±0.01 | 46.6 | 50 | 3.4 | 0 | 0 | 82 |
X ± mx | 399,7 | 0,88±0,05 | 0.32±0.06 | 0.15±0.05 | 53.3 | 40 | 6.7 | 0 | 0 | 76.7 | |||
Table 2. Climatic characteristics of the area
Year | Average climatic characteristics | |||||
Mean annual temperatures, ℃ | Annual precipitation, mm | Snow depth, mm | Mean July temperature, ° С | Mean January temperature, ° С | Total precipitation per season, mm | |
2018 | +2.6 | 473 | 17.3 | +20.9 | –14.1 | 280 |
2019 | +4.0 | 583 | 19.5 | +19.5 | –11.4 | 358 |
Average | +3.3 | 528 | 18.4 | +20.2 | –12.8 | 319 |
Fig. 1. Ontogenetic spectrum of fragments of Rosa acicularis coenopopulations
Table 3. Distribution of Rosa acicularis individuals by ontogenetic groups
FCP number | Ontogenetic groups | Demographic indicators |
| ||||||||
im | v | g1 | g2 | g3 | ss | Age index | Index of substitution | Recovery index | Efficiency index | Aging index | |
1 | 26.6 | 53.3 | 10 | 6.6 | 3.5 | 0 | 0.16 | 4 | 4 | 0.44 | 0 |
2 | 20 | 33.2 | 13.6 | 0 | 33.4 | 0 | 0.32 | 1.14 | 1.14 | 0.54 | 0 |
3 | 36.6 | 0 | 16.7 | 30 | 16.7 | 0 | 0.33 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0 |
4 | 43.3 | 13.3 | 16.6 | 20 | 0 | 6.8 | 0.24 | 1.3 | 1.54 | 0.49 | 0.06 |
5 | 60 | 30 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.20 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.58 | 0 |
6 | 20 | 63.3 | 6.6 | 6.6 | 3.5 | 0 | 0.16 | 5 | 5 | 0.44 | 0 |
7 | 33.3 | 43.3 | 10 | 10 | 3.4 | 0 | 0.16 | 3.28 | 3.28 | 0.44 | 0 |
8 | 3.5 | 0 | 36.6 | 46.6 | 13.3 | 0 | 0.43 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.86 | 0 |
Fig. 2. Habitat distribution of Rosa acicularis in coordinates «Delta — Omega»
Table 4. Scores for Rosa acicularis characteristics
Parameters | Points |
| |||
I | II | III | IV | V | |
Organistic signs of individuals |
| ||||
Plant height, m | < 0.41 | 0.41…0.63 | 0.63…0.85 | 0.85…1.07 | 1.07…1.29 |
Crown projection area, m² | < 0.03 | 0.04…0.23 | 0.24…0.43 | 0.44…0.63 | 0.64…0.83 |
Crown volume, m³ | < 0.01 | 0.01…0.13 | 0.13…0.25 | 0.25…0.37 | 0.37…0.49 |
Population signs |
| ||||
Total density, ind./ha | < 144 | 144…319 | 319…494 | 494…669 | 669…844 |
Share im v,% | < 3.5 | 3.5…25.1 | 25.1…46.7 | 46.7…68.3 | 68.4…90.0 |
Share g1g2,% | < 10 | 10…28.3 | 28.3…46.6 | 46.6…64.9 | 64.9…83.2 |
Index of vitality,% | < 69 | 69…73.5 | 73.5…78.0 | 78.0… 82.5 | 82.5…87.0 |
Fig. 3. Assessment of the state of fragments of Rosa acicularis coenopopulations in points: Organismic characteristics: 1 — plant height; 2 — crown projection area; 3 — crown volume. Population characteristics: 4 — density of coenopopulation fragment; 5 — share im-v; 6 — share g1-g2; 7 — index of vitality; 1…5 — points
About the authors
Elena Aleksandrovna Tishkina
Botanical Garden of Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Ural State Forest Engineering University
Author for correspondence.
Email: Elena.MLOB1@yandex.ru
Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Researcher, Laboratory of Ecology of Woody Plants, Botanical Garden of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Associate Professor, Department of Ecology and Nature Management, Ural State Forest Engineering University
202a, 8 Marta st., Yekaterinburg, 620144, Russian Federation; 36, Sibirskiy trakt st., Yekaterinburg, 620100, Russian FederationReferences
- Agaoglu YS. Rose oil industry and the production of oil rose (Rosa damascena Mill) in Turkey. Biotechnol. and Biotechnol. Equip. 2000; 14(2):8—15. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2000.10819079
- Balick MJ, Kronenberg F, Ososki AL, Reiff M, Fugh-Berman A, Roble M, et al. Medicinal plants used by Latino healers for women’s health conditions in New York City. Econ. Bot. 2000; 54(3): 344—357. doi: 10.1007/BF02864786
- Pimenov АV, Shemderg МA. Chemical polymorphism of Rosa L. in the contrast climatic conditions. Climate Change, Biodiversity and Boreal Forest Ecosystems: Conference Abstracts. Joensuu, Finland; 1995.
- Geissman TA. (ed.) The chemistry of flavonoid compounds. London — New York: Pergamon-Macmillan; 1962.
- Du H, Zhang X, Zhang R, Zhang L, Yu D, Jiang L. Extraction and the fatty acid profile of Rosa acicularis seed oil. Journal of Oleo Science. 2017; 66(12):1301—1310. doi: 10.5650/jos.ess17006
- Vasfilova ES, Tret’yakova AS, Podgaevskaya EN, Zolotareva NV, Khokhlova MG, Igosheva NI, et al. Dikorastushchie lekarstvennye rasteniya Urala [Ural wild medicinal plants]. Ekaterinburg: Ural University publ.; 2014.
- Gustafsson A, Schroderheim J. Ascorbic acid and hip fertility in Rosa species. Nature. 1944; 153:196—197. doi: 10.1038/153196a0
- Wegg SM, Townsley PM. Ascorbic acid in cultured tissue of briar rose. Rosa rugosa Thunb. Plant Cell Reports. 1983; (2):78—81. doi: 10.1007/BF00270170
- Makarov AA. Lekarstvennye rasteniya Yakutii [Medicinal plants of Yakutia]. Yakutsk: Bichik publ.; 2001.
- Kozhevnikov AP, Kostarev IN. The introduction of woody introduced species into the undergrowth of forest parks in Yekaterinburg. Lesa Rossii i khozyaistvo v nikh. 2018; (4):49—56.
- Kozhevnikov AP, Tishkina EA, Chermnykh AI. Chamaecytisus ruthenicus (Fisch. ex Wol.) Klask. in the forest parks of the Yekaterinburg. Bulletin of Botanic Garden of Saratov State University. 2018; 16(4):30—37.
- Kozhevnikov AP, Kozhevnikova GM, Kapralov AV. Lesnye resursy Urala dlya rekreatsii i poznavatel’nogo turizma [Forest resources of the Urals for recreation and educational tourism]. Ekaterinburg: UGLTU publ.; 2009.
- Rabotnov TA. Questions of studying the composition of the population for the purposes of phytocenology. In: Problemy botaniki. Vyp.1. [Problems of botany. Vol. 1]. 1950; p.465—483.
- Uranov AA. Age spectrum of phytocenopopulations as a function of time and energy wave processes. International Research Journal. 1975; (2):7—34.
- Glotov NV. Assessment of parameters of age structure in plant populations. In: Zhizn’ populyatsii v geterogennoi srede. Ch.1 [Life of populations in a heterogeneous environment. Part 1]. Yoshkar-Ola: Periodika Marii El; 1998. p.146—149.
- Zhivotovsky LA. Ontogenetic states, effective density and classification of plant populations. Russian Journal of Ecology. 2001; (1):3—7.
- Zhukova LA. Intrapopulation biodiversity of herbaceous plants. In: Ekologiya i genetika populyatsii [Ecology and genetics of populations]. Yoshkar-Ola; 1998. p.35—47.
- Smirnova OV, Chistyakova AA, Popadyuk RV, Evstigneev OI, Korotkov VN, Mitrofanova MV, et al. Populyatsionnaya organizatsiya rastitel’nogo pokrova lesnykh territorii (na primere shirokolistvennykh lesov evropeiskoi chasti SSSR) [Population organization of the vegetation cover of forest areas (on the example of deciduous forests of the European USSR)]. Pushchino: PNTc RAN publ.; 1990.
- Alekseev VA. Diagnostics of vital state of trees and forest stands. Russian Journal of Forest Science. 1989; (4):51—57.
- Tishkina EA, Chermnykh AI. Ecological and phytocenotic characteristics of Rosa acicularis L. in Ekaterinburg forest park zone. RUDN Journal of Agronomy and Animal Industries. 2019; 14(1):49—56. doi: 10.22363/2312–797X–2019–14–1–49–56
Supplementary files
