Ways to increase milk productivity of Red Gorbatov breed

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Conservation of cattle breed diversity is one of the urgent problems of animal husbandry. Of special interest is the study of the last remaining population of Red Gorbatov cattle, descended from Tyrolean cattle, which is represented by Tux-Z illertal breed today. The purpose of the research was to study the influence of bloodline of Red Gorbatov breed on dairy productivity of cows. The objectives of the study included analysis of the current state of gene pool population of Red Gorbatov cattle saturated with Angler and Red Danish breeds over the last years. Purebred Red Gorbatov cows and crossbred animals obtained by crossing with Angler and Red Danish breeds were compared according to the following indicators of milk productivity: average milk yield for all lactations, fat and protein content in milk, milk fat and protein yield. Average value, coefficients of variation and correlation were calculated. The results of the study showed some superiority of crossbred animals over purebred Red Gorbatov cattle in the value of milk yields: by 5.7 % in crossbreeds with Angler breed and 12.9 % in crossbreeds with Red Danish breed, however, the differences in the values of the trait were not statistically significant. Differences in content of fat and protein in milk were not significant and were in the range from 0.01 to 0.04 %. The revealed values of correlation coefficients showed a significant unrealized potential of milk productivity.

Full Text

 
Fig. 1. Red Gorbatov Heifers
Source: created by the author
 

Fig. 2. Red Gorbatov cow
Source: created by the author

Table 1. Milk productivity in various cow genotypes

Indicator

Group

Average

I

II

III

CV, %

Red Gorbatov breed

CV, %

½ Red Gorbatov × ½ Angler

CV, %

½ Red Gorbatov × ½ Red Danish

Milk yield per lactation, kg

16.9

4840 ± 183

13.0

5117 ± 149

21.7

5464 ± 266

5140 ± 121

MF, %

2.1

4.41 ± 0.02

1.9

4.42 ± 0.02

2.5

4.45 ± 0.02

4.43 ± 0.01

MP, %

1.4

3.29 ± 0.01

1.8

3.27 ± 0.01

2.5

3.31 ± 0.02

3.29 ± 0.01

Milk fat yield,

kg

18.1

213.3 ± 8.6

14.2

226.2 ± 7.2

24.4

243.2 ± 13.2

227.6 ± 5.9

Milk protein yield, kg

18.0

159.4 ± 6.4

14.5

167.5 ± 5.4

24.3

172.5 ± 9.8

169.2 ± 4.4

Live weight, kg

9.6

503 ± 10.8

7.2

486 ± 7.8

7.5

510 ± 8.6

500 ± 5.4

Coefficient of milk productivity

16.8

966 ± 36.2

15.9

1059 ± 37.6

24.1

1078 ± 58.2

1034 ± 26.4

Table 2. Comparative characteristics of milk productivity in experimental groups

Indicator

Difference between groups

I and II

I and III

II and III

Milk yield per lactation, kg

–277*

–624*

–347*

MF, %

–0.01*

–0.04*

–0.03*

MP, %

0.02*

–0.02*

–0.04*

Milk fat yield, kg

–12.9*

–29*

–17*

Milk protein yield, kg

–8,1*

–13,1*

–5*

Live weight, kg

17

–7

–24

Coefficient of milk productivity

–93*

–112*

–19*

Note: * — p> 0.05; the difference is not significant.

Table 3. Correlation between age, live weight and indicators of milk productivity

Correlation coefficients between:

Group

I

II

III

Age and milk yield

–0.18

–0.36

–0.59

Live weight and milk yield

0.24

–0.05

–0.14

Live weight and fat content

0.06

–0.04

–0.02

Live weight and protein content

0.06

0.03

–0.15

Milk yield and fat content

0.54

0.44

0.78

Milk yield and protein content

0.58

0.57

0.74

Fat content and protein content

0.57

0.68

0.92

 

×

About the authors

Grigory S. Shekhovtsev

Russian State Agrarian University - Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy

Author for correspondence.
Email: laichzeit1@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6281-9968

PhD student, Assistant, Department of Dairy and Beef Cattle Breeding

49 Timiryazevskaya st., Moscow, 127434, Russian Federation

References

  1. Zinovieva NA, Sermyagin AA, Dotsev AV, Boronetskaya OI, Petrikeeva LV, Abdelmanova AS, et al. Animal genetic resources: developing the research of allele pool of Russian cattle breeds — minireview. Agricultural Biology. 2019;54(4):631–641. (In Russ.). doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2019.4.631rus
  2. Haller M. Seltene Haus-& Nutztierrassen. Graz: Stocker, 2000.
  3. Baumung R, Sölkner J. Analysis of pedigrees of Tux-Zillertal, Carinthian Blond and Original Pinzgau cattle population in Austria. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics. 2002;119(3):175–181. doi: 10.1046/j.1439‑0388.2002.00332.x
  4. Gorlov IF, Kaidulina AA, Slozhenkina MI, Mosolova NI, Barmina TN, Surkova SA. The effect of crossing red steppe cows breed with bulls of the Angarskaya breed on milk production and morphological and functional characteristics of udder. Agricultural and food innovations. 2018;(3):34–37. (In Russ.). doi: 10.31208/2618‑7353‑2018‑1‑3‑34‑37
  5. Hasanguseynov ОА, Alikhanov MP, Sharipov SМ, Chavtaraev RМ. Efficiency of crossing Angler bulls with animal Red Steppe breed. Novosti nauki v APK. 2018;(2–1):289–292. (In Russ.). doi: 10.25930/q2h9‑2q78
  6. Chavtaraev RM. The influence of Angler blood flow on the productive qualities of Red Steppe cows. Mining agriculture. 2021;(1):92–96. (In Russ.). doi: 10.25691/GSH.2021.1.020
  7. Panfilova GI. Increasing milk productivity of Red Steppe cows when using Ayrshire and Holstein bulls of red-and-white selection. Vestnik of Don State Agrarian University. 2019;(2–1):37–43. (In Russ.).
  8. Kovaleva GP, Melnikova V, Sharko NA. Comparative characteristics of milk productivity of Red Steppe cows and its crossbreeds with Red Holstein Mottled breed. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov Stavropol’skogo nauchno-­issledovatel’skogo instituta zhivotnovodstva i kormoproizvodstva. 2012;1(5):22–27. (In Russ.).
  9. Tekeev ME, Ebzeev MM, Tekeeva HE. Efficiency of using bulls of the Red-motley Holstein breed in breeding new Red Steppe cattle Kuban type. Agrarian Bulletin of the North Caucasus. 2018;(3):52–54. (In Russ.). doi: 10.31279/2222‑9345‑2018‑7‑31‑52‑54
  10. Stenkin NI, Baibikov МF. Crossing efficiency of Bestuzhev cows with Red Danish bulls. Vestnik of Ulyanovsk State Agricultural Academy. 2021;(4):201–205. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18286/1816‑4501‑2021‑4‑201‑205
  11. Stenkin NI, Baibikov МF. Milk productivity and udder morpho-­functional features of Bestuzhev breed heifers and their cross breeds with Red Danish breed. Vestnik of Ulyanovsk State Agricultural Academy. 2019;(1):107–111. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18286/1816‑4501‑2019‑1‑107‑111
  12. Stenkin NI, Baibikov МF. Features of the growth and development of heifers Bestuzhevskaya breed and their crosses with Red Danish breed. Zootechniya. 2018;(7):30–32. (In Russ.).
  13. Basonov OA, Maar DE. Comparative characteristics of productive indicators of red Gorbatov cattle with different blood types. In: Innovations and technological breakthrough in the agro-industrial complex: conference proceedings. Part 2. Bryansk; 2020. p.33–37. (In Russ.).
  14. Rudenko OV. Economic efficiency of breeding red Gorbatov cattle. Vestnik of Nizhny Novgorod State Agricultural Academy. 2012;2:228–231. (In Russ.).
  15. Troshin KA. The influence of blood on improving breeds on the indicators of milk productivity of red Gorbatov cows. In: In the world of scientific discoveries: conference proceedings. Ulyanovsk; 2022. p.3176–3179. (In Russ.).
  16. Rudenko OV, Troshin KA. The influence of bloodline on improving breed on the indicators of milk productivity of red Gorbatov cows. In: Current issues of livestock breeding: conference proceedings. Nizhny Novgorod; 2023. p.81–87. (In Russ.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. Fig. 1. Red Gorbatov Heifers

Download (133KB)
2. Fig. 2. Red Gorbatov cow

Download (142KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Shekhovtsev G.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies