Email this article 
Promising two-row covered cultivars for increasing yield and quality of barley grain in conditions of the southern forest-steppe of Western Siberia
- Authors: Nikolayev P.N.1, Yusova O.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Omsk Agrarian Scientific Center
- Issue: Vol 16, No 4 (2021)
- Pages: 303-312
- Section: Crop production
- URL: https://agrojournal.rudn.ru/agronomy/article/view/19698
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-797X-2021-16-4-303-312
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Agroclimatic features of the regions of barley cultivation necessitate the creation and cultivation of cultivars characterized by adaptability to local bioand abiofactors. Such cultivars are able to form a stable high-quality crop regardless of the conditions prevailing during the growing season. The developing of potentially high-yielding cultivars is a priority task of barley breeding in the West Siberian region. Two-row barley is characterized by grain equalization, reduced husk content and increased extractive content, compared to sixrow barley. The aim of the study was to characterize the new promising cultivars of barley (two-row covered group) selected in Omsk Agrarian Scientific Center. The research was conducted in the southern forest-steppe of Western Siberia in 2012-2019. 8 cultivars of coverd two-row barley selected in Omsk Agrarian Scientific Center were studied. There are new promising cultivars among them: ‘Omskiy 100’ (included in the Russian State Register in 2019) and ‘Omskiy 101’ (sent to the State Registration Service in 2018). The standard cultivar was ‘Omskiy 95’ (2007). The biochemical parameters of grain were determined: protein content, crude fat, starch, husk content. Barley selection from 2000 to 2019 focused on the developing of drought-resistant cultivars, which formed increased productivity and quality of grain in dry and arid periods of vegetation in conditions of optimal moistening. New promising cultivars - ‘Omskiy 100’ and ‘Omskiy 101’ were characterized by the formation of increased indicators of grain quality and productivity in vegetation periods that were contrasting in climatic characteristics. Due to increased yield and grain quality, cv. ‘Omskiy100’ had increased protein (+57.91 kg/ha), starch (+0.3 t/ha) and fat (+11.7 kg/ha) harvest compared to the standard. Cv. ‘Omskiy 101’ increased protein harvest by 84.9 kg/ha in comparison to the standard.
Keywords
Full Text
The severity and variability of yield indicators and grain quality in barley cultivars
Cultivar | Mass fraction of protein,% | Mass fraction of starch,% | Mass fraction of crude fat, % | Weight of 1000 grains, g | Husk content,% | Yield, t/ha | ||||||
Lim. | x | Lim. | x | Lim. | x | Lim. | x | Lim. | x | Lim. | x | |
Omskiy 90 | 11.0…17.0 | 14.0 | 52.9…60.1 | 57.2 | 1.2…3.6 | 2.3 | 37.4…56.5 | 47.8 | 8.0…8.5 | 8.2 | 1.9…5.1 | 3.6 |
Omskiy 91 | 11.7…17.1 | 14.0 | 51.6…58.8 | 56.1 | 1.7…3.2 | 2.5 | 33.5…50.4 | 44.2 | 7.5…9.9 | 8.3 | 2.2…5.5 | 3.6 |
Omskiy 95, st. | 11.3…18.1 | 13.5 | 52.2…60.3 | 56.8 | 0.9…3.8 | 2.2 | 35.7…49.3 | 43.6 | 7.2…11.7 | 9.1 | 2.1…5.9 | 4.2 |
Omskiy 96 | 11.7…17.2 | 14.3 | 52.6…58.8 | 56.3 | 0.9…3.3 | 2.3 | 34.2…57.9 | 49.9 | 6.9…10.1 | 8.6 | 2.1…6.2 | 4.0 |
Sibirskiy avangard | 10.8…17.6 | 13.4 | 50.9…63.7 | 56.4 | 1.3…3.2 | 2.2 | 34.6…52.4 | 46.7 | 6.8…8.1 | 7.8 | 1.9…6.7 | 4.0 |
Sasha | 11.8…17.0 | 13.7 | 52.3…59.5 | 55.8 | 1.4…2.7 | 2.3 | 36.3…54.4 | 47.3 | 7.3…13.1 | 9.1 | 2.5…6.5 | 4.6 |
Omskiy 100 | 11.3…16.5 | 13.3 | 52.9…58.8 | 56.3 | 1.8…3.2 | 2.5 | 32.4…54.2 | 47.4 | 6.2…10.6 | 8.4 | 2.8…6.5 | 4.9 |
Omskiy 101 | 12.0…16.7 | 14.2 | 53.6…61.4 | 57.5 | 1.3…3.2 | 2.0 | 35.4…54.5 | 47.2 | 7.5…9.5 | 8.6 | 2.8…6.6 | 4.7 |
Sx | — | 0.1 | — | 0.2 | — | 0.1 | — | 0.7 | — | 0.2 | — | 0.1 |
Fig. 1. Average indicators of productivity and quality of grain of the studied barley cultivars compared to the standard, ± st.
Fig. 2. The average harvest of nutrients from 1 hectare of the studied barley cultivars compared to the standard, ± st.
About the authors
Petr N. Nikolayev
Omsk Agrarian Scientific Center
Author for correspondence.
Email: nikolaev@55anc.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5192-2967
Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Head of the Laboratory for the selection of grain crops
26 Koroleva ave., Omsk, 644012, Russian FederationOksana A. Yusova
Omsk Agrarian Scientific Center
Email: yusova@55anc.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3679-8985
Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Head of the Laboratory of Genetics, Biochemistry and Plant Physiology
26 Koroleva ave., Omsk, 644012, Russian FederationReferences
- Kuzina EV, Davletshin TK, Silishchev NN. Effectiveness of the Elena Biopreparation used the summer Barley. Agricultural Вiology, 2010;4:100—104.
- Khokhar MI, Da Silva JT. Evaluation of drought tolerance and yield capacity of barley (Hordeum vulgare) genotypes under irrigated and water-stressed conditions. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2012; 49 (3): 307—313.
- Rapacz M, Stepień A, Skorupa K. Internal Standards for quantitative RT-PCR studies of gene expression under drought treatment in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.): the Effects of developmental stage and leaf age. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2012; 34(5):1723—1733. doi: 10.1007/s11738-012-0967-1
- Yadav RR, Misra KG, Yadava AK, Kotlia BS, Misra S. Tree-ring footprints of drought variability in last ~300 years over Kumaun Himalaya, India and its relationship with crop productivity. Quaternary Science Reviews. 2015; 117:113—123. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.04.003
- Rodina NA. Selektsiya yachmenya na Severo-Vostoke Nechernozem’ya. [Barley selection in the NorthEast of the Non-Black Earth Region]. Kirov: NIISKh Severo-Vostoka publ.; 2006. (In Russ.).
- Aniskov NI, Kalashnik NA, Kozlova GY, Popolzukhin PV. Golozernyi yachmen’ v Zapadnoi Sibiri [Hullless barley in Western Siberia]. Omsk; Sfera publ.; 2007. (In Russ.).
- Surin NA, Lyakhova NE, Gerasimov SA. Integrated assessment of adaptive ability of barley samples from VIR collection under conditions of Krasnoyarsk forest-steppe. Achievements of science and technology in agro-industrial complex. 2016; 30(6):32—35. (In Russ.).
- Eberhart SA, Russell WA. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science. 1966; 6(1):36—40. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x
- Berkutova NS. Metody otsenki i formirovaniya kachestva zerna [Methods of grain quality evaluation and formation]. Moscow: Rosagropromizdat publ.; 1991. (In Russ.).
- Pleshkov BV. Praktikum po biokhimii rastenii [Workshop on plant biochemistry]. Moscow: Kolos publ.; 1985. (In Russ.).
- Dospekhov BA. Metodika polevogo opyta [Field experience methodology]. Moscow: Agropromizdat publ.; 1985. (In Russ.).
- Hill CB, Li C. Genetic architecture of flowering phenology in cereals and opportunities for crop improvement. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016; 7:1906—1910. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01906
- Ponomareva YN, Zakharova OA. The effect of mineral fertilizers and growth regulator on yield and quality of malt barley in drought conditions. Herald of Ryazan state agrotechnological university named after P.A. Kostychev. 2015; (3):36—42. (In Russ.).
- Nikolaev PN, Yusova OA, Safonova IV, Aniskov NI. Changes in oat grain yield and quality with increased adaptability of cultivars. Proceedings on applied botany, genetics and breeding, 2020; 181(2):42—49. (In Russ.). doi: 10.30901/2227-8834-2020-2-42-49
- Yusova OA, Nikolaev PN, Bendina YB, Safonova IV, Aniskov NI. Stress resistance in barley cultivars of various agroecological origin under extreme continental climate conditions. Proceedings on applied botany, genetics and breeding. 2020; 181(4):44—55. (In Russ.). doi: 10.30901/2227-8834-2020-4-44-55
Supplementary files
