The effectiveness of the use of Aminoseleferon-B with immunodeficiency in highly productive cows under conditions of technogenic environmental load
- Authors: Shaposhnikov I.T.1, Kotsarev V.N.1, Skorikov V.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- Russian Research Veterinary Institute of Pathology, Pharmacology and Therapy
- Issue: Vol 17, No 2 (2022)
- Pages: 221-231
- Section: Veterinary science
- URL: https://agrojournal.rudn.ru/agronomy/article/view/19768
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-797X-2022-17-2-221-231
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Highly productive animals, which are characterized by a more intense metabolism and regulation of the neurohumoral system, are more sensitive to a pool of adverse environmental conditions and can often be accompanied by metabolic disorders, a decrease in the immunobiological status of the macroorganism, reproductive function disorders and the development of pathological processes of various etiology and localization. The studies were carried out in the conditions of a large dairy complex in the Voronezh region located 25 km from a chemical plant for the production of mineral fertilizers: ammonia, ammonium nitrate, nitric acid. Its total emissions to the environment are 5316.5 tons per year, including 4480.3 tons of gases. Studies have been carried out to study the effectiveness of the use of Аminoseleferon-B to correct the immune status of highly productive cows in an immunodeficient state, under conditions of technogenic environmental stress. It was established that Аminoseleferon-B contributed to the activation of humoral and cellular links of nonspecific immunity, the reduction of birth and postpartum pathology, the increase in the effectiveness of treatment, and the improvement of reproductive function.
Full Text
Table 1 Immunological indicators of cows
Indicators | Аnimal groups | ||
First | Second | Third | |
Before drug administration | |||
General immunoglobulins, g/l | 32.28±1.58 | 31.65±1.43 | 31.47±1.29 |
BABS,% | 76.23±1.36 | 76.41±1.09 | 75.84±1.20 |
LABS, mkg/ml | 1.62±0.065 | 1.67±0.093 | 1.60±0.048 |
CIC, g/l | 0.858±0.042 | 0.792±0.053 | 0.864±0.034 |
T-lymphocytes,% | 30.26±1.17 | 30.69±1.19 | 30.12±0.96 |
B-lymphocytes,% | 14.72±0.20 | 14.43±0.21 | 14.34±0.20 |
PAL,% | 73.36±1.56 | 73.51±1.95 | 72.84±1.17 |
PI, units | 3.62±0.21 | 3.58±0.18 | 3.42±0.16 |
PN, units | 2.68±0.10 | 2.52±0.14 | 2.47±0.13 |
After drug administration | |||
General immunoglobulins, g/l | 30.73±1.17 | 35.28±1.31º | 36.72±1.11*ºº |
BABS,% | 77.16±1.23 | 82.33±1.18**º | 84.72±1.25***ºº |
LABS, mkg/ml | 1.68±0.053 | 1.88±0.042º | 1.97±0.051***ººº |
CIC, g/l | 0.869±0.086 | 0.540±0.079 *º | 0.521±0.065**º |
T-lymphocytes,% | 29.43±0.96 | 34.62±1.12*ºº | 37.25±1.14***ººº |
B-lymphocytes,% | 14.20±0.42 | 16.25±0.44**ºº | 17.46±0.34***ººº |
PAL,% | 72.09±1.93 | 79.64±1.48*º | 82.18±1.14***ºº |
PI, units | 3.47±0.27 | 4.18±0.27 | 4.21±0.22* |
PN, units | 2.63±0.09 | 2.95±0.16 | 3.26±0.12**ºº |
Note: * – p < 0.05; ** – p < 0.01; *** – р < 0.001 – to the initial data; º – р < 0.05; ºº – р < 0.01; ººº – р < 0.001 – to the first group.
Table 2. The degree of manifestation of birth and postpartum diseases
Indicators | Groups of cows | ||
First | Second | Third | |
Pathology of childbirth, heads /%: including difficult births, heads/% retention of placenta, heads /% | 3/30.0 2/20.0 1/10.0 | 2/20.0 1/10.0 1/10.0 | 2/20.0 2/20.0 0/0 |
Pathology of the postpartum period, heads /% subinvolution of the uterus, heads /% endometritis, heads /% | 7/70.0 2/20.0 5/50.0 | 5/50.0 2/20.0 3/30.0 | 3/30.0 1/10.0 2/20.0 |
Table 3. Indicators of the effectiveness of the treatment of cows with postpartum pathology
Indicators | Groups of cows | ||
First | Second | Third | |
Treated cows, heads | 7 | 5 | 3 |
Recovered, heads | 7 | 5 | 3 |
Therapeutic effect,% | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Number of drug injections | 6.8±0.42 | 5.2±0.37* | 4.8±0.31** |
Duration of treatment, days | 9.5±0.71 | 7.4±0.46* | 6.7±0.52* |
Note: * – p<0.05; ** – p<0.01 – to the initial data.
Table 4. Indicators of reproductive function in cows
Indicators | Groups of cows | ||
First | Second | Third | |
Period from calving to fertilization, days | 114.3±10.2 | 99.2±11.4 | 96.5±10,4 |
Fertility at the first insemination,% | 50.0 | 60.0 | 60.0 |
Insemination index, units | 2.8±0.24 | 2.5±0.20 | 2.3±0.22 |
About the authors
Ivan T. Shaposhnikov
Russian Research Veterinary Institute of Pathology, Pharmacology and Therapy
Email: 36011958@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0190-9083
Doctor of Biological Sciences, Head of the Laboratory of Toxicology, Risk Assessment of the Safety of Raw Materials and Products of Biological Origin
114 b Lomonosov st., Voronezh, 394087, Russian FederationVladimir N. Kotsarev
Russian Research Veterinary Institute of Pathology, Pharmacology and Therapy
Email: ldmvdc@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9114-7176
Doctor of Veterinary Sciences, Leading Researcher
114 b Lomonosov st., Voronezh, 394087, Russian FederationVladimir N. Skorikov
Russian Research Veterinary Institute of Pathology, Pharmacology and Therapy
Author for correspondence.
Email: skorikov75@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3135-5811
Candidate of Veterinary Sciences, Senior Researcher
114 b Lomonosov st., Voronezh, 394087, Russian FederationReferences
- Lifshits S, Glyaznetsova Y, Erofeevskaya L, Chalaya O, Zueva I. Effect of oil pollution on the ecological condition of soils and bottom sediments of the arctic region (Yakutia). Environ Pollut. 2021;288:117680. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117680
- Kalugina OV, Shergina OV, Mikhailova TA. Ecological condition of natural forests located within the territory of a large industrial center, Eastern Siberia, Russia. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27(18):22400-22413. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08718-z
- Vatnikov Y, Donnik I, Kulikov E, Karamyan A, Notina E, Bykova I, Bannoud G, Bondareva I, Shlindova E, Sotnikova E, Lenchenko E, Rudenko A, Rudenko V, Rudenko P. Effectiveness of Hypericum perforatum L. phytosorbent as a part of complex therapy for acute non-specific bronchopneumonia. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2020;12(S.1):1108-1116. doi: 10.31838/ijpr/2020.SP1.165
- Frie MC, Sporer KR, Wallace JC, Maes RK, Sordillo LM, Bartlett PC, Coussens PM. Reduced humoral immunity and atypical cell-mediated immunity in response to vaccination in cows naturally infected with bovine leukemia virus. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2016;182:125-135. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2016.10.013
- Shaposhnikov IT, Kotsarev VN, Brigadirov YN, Statsenko EI, Lobanov AE. Hematological and immunobiochemical status of highly productive cows in the area of industrial emissions into the atmosphere. Bulletin of veterinary pharmacology. 2018;(1):87-93. (In Russ). doi: 10.17238/issn2541-8203.2018.1.87
- Rudenko P, Sachivkina N, Vatnikov Y, Shabunin S, Engashev S, Kontsevaya S, Karamyan A, Bokov D, Kuznetsova O, Vasilieva E. Role of microorganisms isolated from cows with mastitis in Moscow region in biofilm formation. Veterinary World. 2021;14(1):40-48. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.40-48
- Albernaz TT, Leite RC, Reis JK, de Sousa Rodrigues AP, da Cunha Kassar T, Resende CF, de Oliveira CH, Silva Rd, Salvarani FM, Barbosa JD. Molecular detection of bovine immunodeficiency virus in water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) from the Amazon region, Brazil. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2015;47(8):1625-1628. doi: 10.1007/s11250-015-0884-6
- Vatnikov Y, Shabunin S, Kulikov E, Karamyan A, Murylev V, Elizarov P, Kuznetsova O, Vasilieva E, Petukhov N, Shopinskaya M, Rudenko A, Rudenko P. The efficiency of therapy the piglets gastroenteritis with combination of Enrofloxacin and phytosorbent Hypericum perforatum L. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2020;12(S.2):3064-3073. doi: 10.31838/ijpr/2020.SP2.373
- Zamotaiev OM, Postupalenko VY, Shvadchak VV, Pivovarenko VG, Klymchenko AS, Mély Y. Improved hydration-sensitive dual-fluorescence labels for monitoring peptide-nucleic acid interactions. Bioconjug Chem. 2011;22(1):101-107. doi: 10.1021/bc100434d
- Palikov VA, Palikova YA, Borozdina NA, Nesmeyanova EN, Rudenko PA, Kazakov VA, Kalabina EA, Bukatin MV, Zharmukhamedova TYu, Khokhlova ON, Dyachenko IA. A novel view of the problem of Osteoarthritis in experimental rat model. Research Results in Pharmacology. 2020; 6(2):19-25. doi: 10.3897/rrpharmacology.6.51772
- Rajawat YS, Humbert O, Kiem HP. In-vivo gene therapy with foamy virus vectors. Viruses. 2019; 11(12):1091. doi: 10.3390/v11121091
- Shaposhnikov IT, Kotsarev VN, Mikhailov EV, Chusova GG. Some indicators of the clinical state of highly productive cows with different functional activity of the liver, which are in conditions of ecological trouble. Bulletin of veterinary pharmacology. 2020;1(10):86-95. (In Russ). doi: 10.17238/issn2541-8203.2020.1.86
- Vatnikov Y, Yousefi M, Engashev S, Rudenko P, Lutsay V, Kulikov E, Karamyan A, Dremova T, Tadzhieva A, Strizhakov A, Kuznetsov V, Yagnikov S. Clinical and hematological parameters for selecting the optimal dose of the phytopreparation «Deprim», containing an extract of the herb Hypericum perforatum L., in husbandry. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2020; 12(S.1):2731-2742. doi: 10.31838/ijpr/2020.SP1.401
- Wisnieski L, Norby B, Gandy J, Byrem TM, Sordillo LM. Changes in bovine leukemia virus serological status and lymphocyte count between dry-off and early lactation in Michigan dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2020; 103(10):9473-9480. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17839
- Marawan MA, Alouffi A, El Tokhy S, Badawy S, Shirani I, Dawood A, Guo A, Almutairi MM, Alshammari FA, Selim A. Bovine Leukaemia Virus: current epidemiological circumstance and future prospective. Viruses. 2021;13(11):2167. doi: 10.3390/v13112167
- Vatnikov Y, Donnik I, Kulikov E, Karamyan A, Sachivkina N, Rudenko P, Tumanyan A, Khairova N, Romanova E, Gurina R, Sotnikova E, Bondareva I. Research on the antibacterial and antimycotic effect of the phytopreparation Farnesol on biofilm-forming microorganisms in veterinary medicine. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2020;12(S.2):1481-1492. doi: 10.31838/ijpr/2020.SP2.164
- Erskine RJ, Bartlett PC, Byrem TM, Render CL, Febvay C, Houseman JT. Association between bovine leukemia virus, production, and population age in Michigan dairy herds. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95(2):727-734. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4760