Degradation and distribution of imidaclopridin potatoes
- Authors: Alekseev E.Y.1, Dolzhenko V.I.2
-
Affiliations:
- Innovative Center for Plant Protection
- St. Petersburg Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 21, No 2 (2026)
- Pages: 249-255
- Section: Plant protection
- URL: https://agrojournal.rudn.ru/agronomy/article/view/20357
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-797X-2026-21-2-249-255
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JMELOB
- ID: 20357
Cite item
Abstract
The problem of translocation of the systemic pesticide imidacloprid in potato plants is addressed. The aim of the study was to investigate the pathways of movement, the dynamics of accumulation, and the degradation of the active substance in different plant parts. The field experiment was conducted in the Leningrad Region on the potato variety Udacha, with sampling of aboveground biomass from different parts of whole plants and tubers after treatment. Chemical analysis was performed using an in-house method based on the QuEChERS methodology with HPLC-UV detection. The results confirmed the predominantly xylem-mediated transport of imidacloprid, with maximum concentrations found in the upper foliage. A retrograde redistribution of the active substance downward along the foliage was observed 24 hours after treatment, which may be attributed to reverse flow in the xylem associated with nocturnal root pressure and guttation. Accumulation of imidacloprid residues in tubers was detected, with a peak concentration of 0.074 mg/kg on day 7, exceeding the established maximum residue limit (MRL) of 0.05 mg/kg. This finding suggests a possible downward (basipetal) transport, which is atypical for classic xylem-mobile compounds. The novelty of this study lies in the comprehensive experimental identification of the possible translocation pathways of imidacloprid and the assessment of its redistribution and degradation within the plant. The practical significance is demonstrated by the proven need for strict adherence to the pre-harvest interval for this pesticide on potatoes, as a temporary but significant exceedance of the MRL poses a potential toxicological risk.
About the authors
Elisey Y. Alekseev
Innovative Center for Plant Protection
Author for correspondence.
Email: anscreation@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5566-3245
SPIN-code: 1055-6762
Senior Researcher
20 Pushkinskaya st., Pushkin, Saint Petersburg, 196607, Russian FederationViktor I. Dolzhenko
St. Petersburg Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: dolzhenkotv@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4700-0377
SPIN-code: 9188-7507
Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Deputy Chairman of the Regional Branch
5 Universitetskaya Embankment, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russian FederationReferences
- Trapp S. Plant uptake and transport models for neutral and ionic chemicals. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2004;11(1):33–39. doi: 10.1065/espr2003.08.169 EDN: NSBUYM
- Maienfisch P, Angst M, Brandl F, Fischer W, Hofer D, Kayser H, et al. Chemistry and biology of thiamethoxam: A second generation neonicotinoid. Pest Management Science. 2001;57(10):906–913. doi: 10.1002/ps.365
- Sur R, Stork A. Uptake, translocation and metabolism of imidacloprid in plants. Bulletin of Insectology. 2003;56(1):35–40.
- Elbert A, Haas M, Springer B, Thielert W, Nauen R. Applied aspects of neonicotinoid uses in crop protection. Pest Management Science. 2008;64(11):1099–1105. doi: 10.1002/ps.1616
- Bonmatin JM, Giorio C, Girolami V, Goulson D, Kreutzweiser DP, Krupke C, et al. Environmental fate and exposure; neonicotinoids and fipronil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International. 2015;22(1):35–67. doi: 10.1007/s11356–014–3332–7 EDN: FAEWXA
- Yu Y, Wang S, Zhang Q, Yang Y, Chen Y, Liu X, et al. Dissipation, residues, and risk assessment of imidacloprid in Zizania latifolia and purple sweet potato under field conditions using LC–MS/MS. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B. 2018;54(2):89–97. doi: 10.1080/03601234.2018.1531661
- Alekseev EY, Chermenskaya TD. Dynamics of imidacloprid and abamectin degradation on potatoes treated with Obelisk, KS. In: Breeding, seed production and cultivation technologies of agricultural crops: conference proceedings. Tiraspol; 2020. pp.196–198. (In Russ.).
- Taiz L, Zeiger E, Møller IM, Murphy A. Plant physiology and development. Sinauer Associates; 2022.
- Zimmermann U, Schneider H, Wegner LH, Wagner HJ, Szimtenings M, Haase A, et al. What are the driving forces for water lifting in the xylem conduit? Physiologia Plantarum. 2002;114(3):327–335. doi: 10.1034/j.1399‑3054.2002.1140301.x EDN: BATSPV
- Zimmermann U, Schneider, H, Wegner LH, Haase A. Water ascent in tall trees: does evolution of land plants rely on a highly metastable state? New Phytologist. 2004;162(3):575–615. doi: 10.1111/j.1469‑8137.2004.01083.x EDN: EBPNGD
- Meyer CF, Esau K. Anatomy of Seed Plants. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 1960;87(4):286–287. doi: 10.2307/2482879
- Singh S. Guttation: New insights into agricultural implications. Advances in Agronomy. 2014;128:97–135. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802139-2.00003‑2 EDN: UNMJRI
- Girolami V, Mazzon L, Squartini A, Mori N, Marzaro M, Di Bernardo A, et al. Translocation of neonicotinoid insecticides from coated seeds to seedling guttation drops: a novel way of intoxication for bees. Journal of Economic Entomology. 2009;102(5):1808–1815. doi: 10.1603/029.102.0511
- Schmolke A, Kearns B, O’Neill B. Plant guttation water as a potential route for pesticide exposure in honey bees: a review of recent literature. Apidologie. 2018;49(5):637–646. doi: 10.1007/s13592-018-0591-1
- Blacquière T, Smagghe G, Van Gestel CA, Mommaerts V. Neonicotinoids in bees: A review on concentrations, side-effects and risk assessment. Ecotoxicology. 2012;21(4):973–992. doi: 10.1007/s10646‑012‑0863‑x
Supplementary files










