Effect of the combined use of a probiotic and an organic acid complex on enteromicrobiocenosis, hematological and immunological parametersof quails with experimental dysbiosis

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Dysbiosis in poultry is a common syndrome that is accompanied by decreased productivity and compromised animal health. Despite the availability of various drugs for correcting the microbiota, the problem of treating dysbiosis remains relevant due to the poor engraftment of probiotic bacteria and their limited antagonistic activity. A promising approach is the combined use of probiotics and organic acids, aimed at improving microbiocenosis and increasing poultry productivity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the combined use of the probiotic Sibersil® and the organic acid complex Salmocil FL on enteromicrobiocenosis, hematological and immunobiological parameters of quails with experimental dysbiosis. For the experiment, 4 groups of quails were formed: group I was kept on a basal diet; group II, with experimentally induced dysbiosis, was also kept on a basal diet; group III consisted of birds with experimental dysbiosis, which were supplemented with the probiotic Sibersil® in addition to the basal diet; group IV consisted of quails with experimental dysbiosis, which were supplemented with the probiotic Sibersil® and the organic acid complex Salmocil FL. The isolation and identification of bacteria were carried out using standard bacteriological methods and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Hematological and immunological blood parameters were determined in birds of all experimental groups. Bacteriological studies revealed that, compared with group II (dysbiosis control), quails in groups III and IV showed an increase in the abundance of Bifidobacterium spp. and a decrease in Enterobacter spp. and Streptococcus spp. In quails of groups I and II, the presence of lactose-positive, lactose-negative, and hemolytic E. coli cultures was noted in the luminal microflora. Hematological and immunological studies showed that in birds of group II (dysbiosis), there was a decrease in T-lymphocyte count to 1.04 ± 0.12 thousand/µL, whereas in groups III and IV, their counts increased to 1.50 ± 0.10 and 1.68 ± 0.20 thousand/µL, respectively. Thus, as a result of the conducted research, it was found that the combined use of the probiotic Sibersil® and the organic acid complex Salmocil FL contributed to the normalization of the microbiota in various biotopes of the quail intestinal tract and improved the immunological parameters of the birds.

About the authors

Nadezhda A. Lescheva

Omsk State Agrarian University named after P.A. Stolypin

Author for correspondence.
Email: na.lescheva@omgau.org
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6334-0422
SPIN-code: 1482-8172

Candidate of Veterinary Sciences (PhD in Veterinary Medicine), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Infectious and Invasive Diseases

1 Institutskaya Square, Omsk, 644008, Russian Federation

Valentina I. Pleshakova

Omsk State Agrarian University named after P.A. Stolypin

Email: vi.pleshakova@omgau.org
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7896-2339
SPIN-code: 4372-5742

Doctor of Veterinary Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Infectious and Invasive Diseases

1 Institutskaya Square, Omsk, 644008, Russian Federation

References

  1. Yurinova GV, Popkova SM, Leschuk SI. Disorders of symbiotic mutual relations a macroorganism — normal microflora and methods their corrections (review). The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series: Biology. Ecology. 2008;1(2):97–101. (In Russ.). EDN: MNIXQH
  2. Donnik IM, Pelevina NA, Vershinina IY. Analysis of dysbiotic disorders in the intestines of poultry in an industrial flock. Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. 2008;(3):37–38. (In Russ.). EDN: IJERHT
  3. Novik YaV, Kilp AS, Kiseleva KV, Arakantseva LA. The influence of probiotic preparations on the composition of the intestinal microflora of geese. Veterinary, Zootechnics and Biotechnology. 2025;(1):33–43. (In Russ.). doi: 10.36871/vet.zoo.bio.202501105 EDN: WLHBLD
  4. Melnichenko Yu A. The composition of the boilers intestinal microflora after using polyfunctional probiotics. Animal Husbandry Products Production and Processing Technology. 2015;(2):29–32. (In Russ.). EDN: VSYFSN
  5. Bovkun GF, Vashchekin EP, Malik NI, Malin EV. Intestinal dysbiosis in young birds. Veterinariya sel’skokhozyaistvennykh zhivotnykh. 2008;(5):51–52. (In Russ.). EDN: ZCRLET
  6. El-Hack ME, El-Saadony M, et al. Probiotics in poultry feed: a comprehensive review. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 2020;104(6):1835–1850. doi: 10.1111/jpn.13454 EDN: PITKUF
  7. Khurai RYa, Marchenko TV. Disbakterioz zhivotnykh [Dysbiosis of animals]. Veterinaria Kubani. 2010;(6):10–11. (In Russ.). EDN: MYEIBF
  8. Korneev ML, Mironov AYu, Seleznev AS, Gorokhov MS. Microbiota the parietal mucin and its modification by the probiotics. Humans and their Health. 2008;(2):6–10. (In Russ.). EDN: JWALYX
  9. Abdel-Moneim AE, Elbaz AM, Khidr RE, Badri FB. Effect of in Ovo inoculation of Bifidobacterium spp. on growth performance, thyroid activity, ileum histomorphometry and microbial enumeration of broilers. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins. 2020;12(3):873–882. doi: 10.1007/s12602–019–09613-x
  10. Cetin N, Guclu B, Cetin E. The effects of probiotic and mannanoligosaccharide on some haematological and immunological parameters in turkeys. Journal of Veterinary Medicine. Series A. 2005;52(6):263–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.2005.00736.x
  11. Dai D, Qiu K, et al. Organic acids as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters alter the intestinal structure and microbiota and improve the growth performance in broilers. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021;11:1–14. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.618144
  12. Gusils C, Opezzo O, Pizzaro R, González S. Adhesion of probiotic lactobacilli to chick intestinal mucus. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 2003;49(7):472–478. doi: 10.1139/w03–055
  13. Hager CL, Isham N, Schrom KP, et al. Effects of a novel probiotic combination on pathogenic bacterial-fungal polymicrobial biofilms. mBio. 2019;10(2):e00338–19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00338–19
  14. Gizatullina SS, Birger LI, Kulinich A, et al. A method for assessing the state of the human intestinal microflora by the number of active bacteria and the type of adhesins. Journal of Microbiology, Epidemiology and Immunobiology. 1991;(2):21–23. (In Russ.).
  15. Ursova NI. Immunological function of intestinal microflora, its abnormalities and possibilities of correction. Almanac of Clinical Medicine. 2015;(40):35–46. (In Russ.). EDN: UJUTMJ
  16. Taldykina AA, Semenyutin VV. The effect of organic acids on the intestinal microflora of broiler chickens. In: Znaniya molodykh dlya razvitiya veterinarnoi meditsiny i APK strany: materialy Kh Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. studentov, aspirantov i molodykh uchenykh: Proceedings of the X International Scientific Conference of Students, Postgraduates and Young Scientists. Saint Petersburg; 2021:351–352. (In Russ.).
  17. Vorobyev AA, Nesvizhsky YuV, Bogdanova EA, Korneev ML. Specific features of the microbiocenosis of parietal mucin in the gastrointestinal tract of rats. Journal of Microbiology, Epidemiology and Immunobiology. 2005;(6):3–7. (In Russ.). EDN: HSUXFL
  18. Shubich MG. Detection of cationic protein in the cytoplasm of leukocytes using bromophenol blue. Tsitologiia. 1974;(10):1321–1322. (In Russ.). EDN: QBTHXD

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2026 Lescheva N.A., Pleshakova V.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.