Impact of cultivation technologies on yield and grain quality of winter wheat Triticum aestivum L. in Moscow region

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The current study is aimed at evaluating the reaction of winter wheat varieties according to cultivation technologies at a different level of intensity i.e. basic, intensive and high intensive. The cultivation technologies included fertilizers, pesticides and growth regulators at different combinations and concentrations. The experiment was established in order to determine the optimum conditions of winter wheat cultivation. Three winter wheat varieties were studied: Moskovskaya 40 (V1), Nemchinovskaya 17 (V2) and Nemchinovskaya 85 (V3). Yield performances and grain quality (measured through protein and gluten content) were determined according to the tested cultivation technologies. The results showed that the cultivation technology affected grain wheat productivity and quality on all varieties studied, since the highest yields were obtained using high intensive cultivation technology for all varieties studied, Moskovskaya 40 - 9.65 t/h, Nemchinovskaya 17 - 8.58 t/h and Nemchinovskaya 85 - 9.87 t/h. However, according to the basic technology, the yield was lower by 20…64 %. The tested cultivation technologies demonstrated that high intensive cultivation technology increased wheat quality. The highest protein content (18 %) was recorded in Nemchinovskaya 85 variety. The present results give real opportunities for a largescale application of the tested cultivation technologies in different agricultural lands of Russia.

About the authors

Nazih Y. Rebouh

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: n.rebouh@outlook.fr

PhD student, Agrobiotechnological Department

Moscow, Russian Federation

Petr M. Polityko

Nemchinovka Federal Research Center

Email: niicrnz@mail.ru

Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Varietal Technologies of Winter Grain Crops

Moscow region, Russian Federation

Vladimir N. Kapranov

Nemchinovka Federal Research Center

Email: niicrnz@mail.ru

Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Varietal Technologies of Winter Grain Crops

Moscow region, Russian Federation

Viktor N. Fedorischev

Nemchinovka Federal Research Center

Email: fer@gmail.ru

Doctor of Agricultural Sciences

Moscow region, Russian Federation

Nina J. Garmasch

Nemchinovka Federal Research Center

Email: ni.juriev@yandex.ru

Doctor of Biological Sciences

Moscow region, Russian Federation

Gaik P. Atmachian

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Email: atmachian@gmail.com

PhD candidate, Agroengineering Department

Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Sandukhadze BI, Zhuravleva EV, Kochetygov GA. Ozimaya pshenitsa Nechernozem’ya v reshenii prodovol’stvennoi bezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsi [Non-chernozem winter wheat in addressing the food security of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, Voshod - A publ., 2011; 156. (In Russ.)
  2. Alcamo J, Dronin N, Endejan M, Golubev G, Kirilenko A. A new assessment of climate change impacts on food production shortfalls and water availability in Russia. Global Environmental Change. 2007; 17(3- 4):429-444. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.12.006
  3. Savary S, Ficke A, Aubertot JN, Clayton Hollier. Crop losses due to diseases and their implications for global food production losses and food security. Food Sec. 2012; 4(4):519-537. doi: 10.1007/s12571-012-0200-5
  4. Pakhomov VI, Rykov VB, Kambulov SI, Kambulov IA, Demina EB, Kolesnik VV. The quality of winter wheat grain in dependence to the cultivation technologies. Grain Economy of Russia. 2016; 48(6):55-59. (In Russ.)
  5. Polityko PM, Zhilyaev AM, Parygina MN, Volpe AA. Influence of growing conditions on germination, overwintering and productivity of new varieties of winter wheat. Herald of Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University. 2007; (4):48-51. (In Russ.)
  6. Polityko PM, Matyuta SV, Zyablova MN, Kiselev EF, Volpe AA, Bogdanov AY, et al. Varietal agrochemical and phytosanitary technologies of winter wheat cultivation in the central region of Russia. Problemy agrohimii i ekologii. 2012; (4):22-28. (In Russ.)
  7. Oliinyk KM, Davydiuk GV, Blazhevych LY, Khudoliy LV. Impact of cultivation technologies elements on winter wheat grain productivity and quality. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection. 2016; (4):45-50. (In Ukrainian) doi: 10.21498/2518-1017.4(33).2016.88671
  8. Ray DK, Mueller ND, West PC, Foley JA. Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(6): e66428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066428
  9. Rebouh NY, Polityko PM, Pakina E, Plushikov VG, Norezzine A, Gadzhikurbanov A, et al. Impact of three integrated crop protection treatments on the varieties of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Moscow area, Russia. Research on Crops. 2019; 20(1):161-168. doi: 10.31830/2348-7542.2019.022
  10. Rebouh NY, Polityko P, Latati M, Pakina E, Kapranov V, Imbia A, et al. Infl of three-pest management treatments against aphid, Sitobionavenae in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Moscow area conditions. Research on Crops. 2019; 20(2):381-388. doi: 10.31830/2348-7542.2019.056
  11. Shi R, Zhang Y, Chen X, Sun Q, Zhang F, Roemheld V. Influence of longterm nitrogen fertilization on micronutrient density in grain of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Cereal Sci. 2010; 51(1):165-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2009.11.008
  12. Vaccino P, Corbellini M, Reffo G, Zoccatelli G, Migliardi M, Tavella L. Impact of Eurygaster maura (Heteroptera: Scutelleridae) feeding on quality of bread wheat in relation to attack period. J Econ Entomol. 2006; 99(3):757-763. doi: 10.1093/jee/99.3.757
  13. Wratten SD. The nature of the effects of the aphids, Sitobion avenae and Metopolophium dirhodum on the growth of wheat. Ann Appl Biol. (1975). 79(1):27-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1975.tb01518.x
  14. Zargar M, Polityko P, Pakina E, Bayat M, Vandyshev V, Kavhiza N, et al. Productivity, quality and economics of four spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars as affected by three cultivation technologies. Agronomy Research. 2018; 16(5):2254-2264. doi: 10.15159/AR.18.204
  15. Belamkar V, Guttieri MJ, Hussain W, Jarquín D, El-basyoni I, Poland J, et al. Genomic selection in preliminary yield trials in a winter wheat breeding program. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 2018; 8(8):2735- 2747. doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200415
  16. Chen XX, Zhang W, Liang XY, Liu YM1, Xu SJ, Zhao QY, et al. Physiological and developmental traits associated with the grain yield of winter wheat as affected by phosphorus fertilizer management. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):16580. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53000-z
  17. Cramer MD, Lewis OAM. The influence of nitrate and ammonium nutrition on the growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and maize (Zea mays) plants. Ann Bot. 1993; 72(4):359-365. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1993.1119
  18. Curci PL, Cigliano RA, Zuluaga DL, Janni M, Sanseverino W, Sonnante G. Transcriptomic response of durum wheat to nitrogen starvation. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7:1176. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01377-0
  19. Ercoli L, Masoni A, Pampana S, Mariotti M, Arduini I. As durum wheat productivity is affected by nitrogen fertilization management in Central Italy. European J Agron. 2013; 44:38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2012.08.005
  20. Jaleel CA, Gopi R, Panneerselvam R. Growth and photosynthetic pigments responses of two varieties of Catharanthus roseus to triadimefon treatment. Comptes Rendus Biologies. 2008; 331(4):272-277. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2008.01.004
  21. Ma C, Liu YN, Liang L, Zhai BN, Zhang HQ, Wang ZH. Effects of combined application of chemical fertilizer and organic manure on wheat yield and leaching of residual nitrate-N in dryland soil. The Journal of Applied Ecology. 2018; 29(4):1240-1248. (In Chineese) doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201804.023
  22. Makino A. Photosynthesis, grain yield, and nitrogen utilization in rice and wheat. Plant Physiology. 2010; 155(1):125-129. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.165076
  23. Anderson WK. Closing the gap between actual and potential yield of rainfed wheat. The impacts of environment, management and cultivar. Field Crops Research. 2010; 116(1-2):14-22. doi: 10.1016/j. fcr.2009.11.016
  24. Marino S, Tognetti R, Alvino A. Effects of varying nitrogen fertilization on crop yield and grain quality of emmer grown in a typical Mediterranean environment in central Italy. European J Agron. 2011; 34(3):172-180. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2010.10.006

Copyright (c) 2020 Rebouh N.Y., Polityko P.M., Kapranov V.N., Fedorischev V.N., Garmasch N.J., Atmachian G.P.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies