Email this article 
Rooting green cuttings of Altai seabuckthorn cultivars in industrial-scale experiment
- Authors: Zubarev Y.A.1, Gunin A.V.1, Vorobjeva A.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Federal Altai Scientific Center of Agrobiotechnologies
- Issue: Vol 17, No 2 (2022)
- Pages: 131-145
- Section: Crop production
- URL: https://agrojournal.rudn.ru/agronomy/article/view/19760
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-797X-2022-17-2-131-145
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Green cutting propagation technologies of seabuckthorn ( Hippophae rhamnoides L.) are well developed and highly effective under optimal parameters of implementation. Differences in root development in most cases are connected with varietal specificity. In conditions of uncovered greenhouses, weather particularities can influence significantly on development of cuttings. Hence, the aim of investigation was to study the cultivar difference in root development of seabuckthorn green cuttings in a long-term industrial-scale experiment in conditions of uncovered greenhouse facilities. The experiments were carried out in forest-steppe area of Altai krai in 2018-2021. Seventeen seabuckthorn cultivars developed by Federal Altai Scientific Center of Agrobiotechnologies were taken as research objects. Significant varietal specificity of rooting ability of green cuttings has been established. The experiments showed that season particularities just slightly affect this parameter, indicating significant homeostasis of seabuckthorn cultivars in this regard. Altaiskaya, Ognivo, Gnom, Ethna, Elizaveta and Athena varieties showed the highest level of rhizogenesis with everage rooting percentage from 91.2 to 95.5 %. Group of low rooted cultivars included Azhurnaya, Aurelia, Zlata, Sudarushka and Avgustina with rooting percentage from 70.5 to 79.7 %. Other cultivars showed intermediate figures. High correlation level (0.59±0.21) was shown between total root quality and rhizogenesis ability. Cultivars which demonstrated high rooting percentage also formed high level of first grade seedlings. In this regard, the best cultivars were Altaiskaya, Gnom and Ognivo, which formed 79.1, 82.1 and 83.8 % of first-grade seedlings, respectively. Low rooting ability was observed in cultivars Avgustina, Sudarushka and Zlata, which provided only 55.4…64.4 % of first-grade planting material. The variation coefficient of seabuckthorn standard seedlings was low and did not exceed 9.7 % for Avgustina cultivar. The variation of seedlings quality was at a higher level - u p to 27.3 % for cv. Sudarushka, however, for the rest of the cultivars it was low or medium and ranged from 2.7 to 18.7 %. According to the results of cluster analysis, the seabuckthorn cultivars were divided into three separate groups - slow-, medium- and fast-to-root genotypes.
Full Text
Table 1. Amount of standard one–year plants of seabuckthorn,%, 2018–2021
Cultivar | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | Mean | V, % |
Chuiskaya (st) | 85.8 | — | 92.0 | 89.9 | 89.2 | 4.1 |
Altaiskaya | 90.7 | 97.7 | 97.9 | 95.5 | 95.5 | 5.6 |
Ognivo | 95.0 | 95.8 | 94.2 | 95.7 | 95.2 | 1.2 |
Afina | 89.1 | 95.0 | 96.5 | 94.7 | 93.8 | 5.1 |
Elizaveta | 83.9 | 97.4 | 95.2 | 96.0 | 93.1 | 8.5 |
Gnom | 93.1 | 86.7 | 91.8 | 93.3 | 91.2 | 4.1 |
Ethna | 89.7 | 94.4 | 86.2 | 94.1 | 91.2 | 5.3 |
Inja | 90.3 | 92.6 | 76.5 | 92.2 | 87.9 | 8.9 |
Klavdia | 88.9 | 90.1 | 84.5 | 84.5 | 87.0 | 3.7 |
Zhemchuzhnitsa | 85.5 | 86.1 | 86.8 | 84.5 | 85.7 | 1.2 |
Aley | 80.6 | 81.5 | 87.9 | 89.5 | 84.8 | 5.4 |
Essel | 75.2 | 85.3 | 81.8 | 89.6 | 83.0 | 7.1 |
Sudarushka | 73.8 | 83.3 | 72.3 | 89.7 | 79.7 | 9.6 |
Zlata | — | 85.1 | 66.9 | 72.6 | 74.9 | 8.7 |
Azhurnaya | 68.4 | 70.3 | 67.4 | 80.7 | 71.7 | 6.9 |
Avgustina | 76.5 | 67.4 | 60.4 | 79.9 | 71.1 | 9.7 |
Aurelia | — | 78.3 | 67.2 | 65.8 | 70.5 | 6.3 |
Total | 84.4 | 86.7 | 82.7 | 87.5 | 85.7 | — |
LSD05 | А* — 5.5, В — Ff < Ft |
| ||||
*Note: factor А – cultivar, factor В – year.
Table 2. Amount of seabuckthorn first grade plant material, % from rooted, 2018–2021
Culltivar | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | Mean | V, % |
Chuiskaya (st) | 71.7 | — | 52.5 | 54.2 | 59.2 | 9.2 |
Altaiskaya | 70.6 | 86.0 | 72.1 | 87.2 | 79.1 | 10.9 |
Ognivo | 85.8 | 85.8 | 83.2 | 80.6 | 83.8 | 2.7 |
Afina | 71.3 | 81.0 | 79.0 | 71.2 | 75.7 | 7.3 |
Elizaveta | 56.5 | 89.2 | 77.2 | 77.9 | 75.8 | 18.1 |
Gnom | 88.0 | 79.4 | 83.7 | 77.5 | 82.1 | 6.4 |
Ethna | 61.6 | 86.2 | 70.8 | 73.6 | 73.2 | 12.9 |
Inja | 68.4 | 65.9 | 54.9 | 67.1 | 64.5 | 11.6 |
Klavdia | 63.4 | 67.8 | 68.8 | 75.0 | 68.6 | 3.6 |
Zhemchuzhnitsa | 76.8 | 73.6 | 67.1 | 72.4 | 72.5 | 3.7 |
Aley | 77.3 | 73.1 | 76.8 | 83.5 | 77.7 | 7.5 |
Essel | 56.9 | 70.3 | 63.1 | 69.1 | 65.2 | 10.6 |
Sudarushka | 33.2 | 65.2 | 49.4 | 76.4 | 57.4 | 27.3 |
Zlata | — | 71.4 | 49.0 | 70.1 | 64.4 | 18.7 |
Azhurnaya | 57.3 | 61.5 | 66.2 | 79.1 | 66.5 | 14.5 |
Avgustina | 54.9 | 67.4 | 41.6 | 56.3 | 55.4 | 15.1 |
Aurelia | — | 77.0 | 53.3 | 76.1 | 69.2 | 16.0 |
Mean | 67.9 | 75.7 | 66.6 | 73.5 | 70.6 | 17.5 |
Range | 33.2…88.0 | 61.5…89.2 | 41.6…83.7 | 54.2…87.2 | 55.4…83.8 | — |
LSD05 | А* — 7.2, В — Ff< Ft | |||||
*Note: factor А – cultivar, factor В – year
Cluster analysis dendrogram of cultivar distribution depending on rooting ability of green cuttings
About the authors
Yuri A. Zubarev
Federal Altai Scientific Center of Agrobiotechnologies
Email: niilisavenko@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3349-0555
Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Fruit and Berry Crop Selection, Lisavenko Research Institute of Horticulture for Siberia
35 Nauchniy Gorodok, Barnaul, 656910, Russian FederationAlexey V. Gunin
Federal Altai Scientific Center of Agrobiotechnologies
Email: alexeygunin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8008-8951
Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Fruit and Berry Crop Selection, Lisavenko Research Institute of Horticulture for Siberia
35 Nauchniy Gorodok, Barnaul, 656910, Russian FederationAnastasia V. Vorobjeva
Federal Altai Scientific Center of Agrobiotechnologies
Author for correspondence.
Email: nast.nv-2124@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1020-0589
Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Fruit and Berry Crop Selection, Lisavenko Research Institute of Horticulture for Siberia
35 Nauchniy Gorodok, Barnaul, 656910, Russian FederationReferences
- Mistratova NA. The role of substrators and growth regulators in the formation of quality of the seabuckthorn landing material. Fruit growing and viticulture of South Russia. 2014;28(4):66—73. (In Russ).
- Mistratova NA. The amount of high quality seabuckthorn seedlings depending on substrates and root development stimulators. Bulletin of KrasSAU. 2008; (4):312—315. (In Russ).
- Bopp VL. The peculiarities of sea-buckthorn propagation with green cuttings. Mongolian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2018;24(2):33—35. doi: 10.5564/mjas.v24i02.1115
- Bopp VL, Fomina NV. Optimization of the conditions of rhizogenesis and assessment of the enzymatic activity of the substrates used for rooting of cuttings of berry shrubs in Siberia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020; 548:052009. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/548/5/052009
- Bedareva NP. The intensive method of sea buckthorn and honeysuckle reproduction under the conditions of Eastern Kazakhstan. Science and world. 2017;(9—1):34—36. (In Russ).
- Skali LP. Efficiency of the spent champignon substrate and sawdust in artificial mixtures for green cuttings rooting of horticultural crops. Izvestiya of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. 2005;(3):48—58. (In Russ).
- Zubarev YA, Shmatova TM. Improvement of seabuckthorn propagation technology at Altai. In: Zubarev Y, Eagle D, Morsel JT. (eds). Seabuckthorn. Research for a promising crop: A look at recent developments in cultivation, breeding, technology, health and environment. Berlin: Books on Demand; 2014. p.9—23.
- Lovtsova NM, Namzalov BB. Influence of phytohormones on rooting of different-sex green sea buckthorn cuttings. Natural and technical sciences. 2020;(5):39—40. (In Russ). doi: 10.25633/ETN.2020.05.06
- Vasiljeva N, Budazhapov L. The rhizogenesis of green cuttings of buryat sea buckthorn varieties in the conditions of artificial fog. In: Nauchnoe obespechenie razvitiya APK i sel’skikh territorii Baikal’skogo regiona [Scientific assistance of agro-industrial complex and rural areas development of the Baikal region: proceedings]. Ulan-Ude: Buryatskaya gosudarstvennaya sel’skokhozyaistvennaya akademiya imeni V.R. Filippova publ.; 2018. p. 28—31. (In Russ).
- Sultanova ZK, Kharlamova TA, Sotnikova VV. Growth regulators utilization in fruit and berry crops propagation. Pomiculture and small fruits culture in Russia. 2004;(11):225—229. (In Russ).
- Tserentogtokh N, Shine-Od U. Influence of stimulators on rooting of the sea buckthorn softwood cuttings. In: Innovatsionnye aspekty agronomii v povyshenii produktivnosti rastenii i kachestva produktsii v Sibiri [Innovative aspects of agronomy in plant productivity and product quality increasing in Siberia: conference proceedings]. Ulan-Ude: Buryatskaya gosudarstvennaya sel’skokhozyaistvennaya akademiya imeni V.R. Filippova publ.; 2015. p. 122—123. (In Russ).
- Adalina ON. Optimization of propagation technology of garden plants by herbaceous cuttings. Izvestiya of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. 2013;(4):5—22. (In Russ).
- Kuprina MN, Kolesnikova VL. The use of the peat-based growth stimulants in the berry nursery. Bulletin of KrasSAU. 2014;7(94):85—91. (In Russ).
- Shamanskaya LD, Zubareva EN. The results of Vita-start testing as new supplement in seabuckthorn propagation. Achievements of Science and Technology of AIC. 2012;(3):19—21. (In Russ).
- Shamanskaya LD, Guschina EN. The results of succinic acid testing at seabuckthorn seedlings growing. Achievements of Science and Technology of AIC. 2009;(7):12—14. (In Russ).
- Pugach VA, Zubarev YA, Pugach DA, Maltsev MI. The effect of sodium salts of carboxymethyl ethers in green cuttings of seabuckthorn. In: Innovatsionnye napravleniya razvitiya sibirskogo sadovodstva: nasledie akademikov M.A. Lisavenko, I.P. Kalininoi: sbornik statei [Innovative trends of Siberian horticulture development: Academicians M.A. Lisavenko, I.P. Kalinina legacy: conference proceedings]. Barnaul: Kontsept publ.; 2018. p. 216—221. (In Russ).
- Zubarev YA, Shmatova TM. The characteristics of seabuckthorn green cuttings growing at different ways of cultivation. Achievements of Science and Technology of AIC. 2013;(7):42—44. (In Russ).
- Besschetnov VP, Kentbaev EZ. Propagation of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) by herbaceous cuttings in a climate of south-east Kazakhstan. Russian Forestry Journal. 2018;(4):56—62. (In Russ). doi: 10.17238/issn0536—1036.2018.4.56
- Dolkar P, Angmo P, Dolkar D, Kumar B, Chaurasia O, Stobdan T. Effect of Mulching, Shading, Spacing and Cutting Thickness on Propagation of Seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) by Cuttings. Defence Life Science Journal. 2017;3(1): 75—79. doi: 10.14429/dlsj.3.12093
- Dolkar P, Dolkar D, Angmo S, Srivastava R, Stobdan T. An improved method for propagation of seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) by cuttings. National Academy Science Letters. 2016;(39):323—326. doi: 10.1007/s40009-016-0489-2
- Singh V, Gupta R. Propagation of Seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.). In: Singh V, Kallio HP, Sawhney RC, Gupta RK, RongSen L, Eliseev IP, et. al. (eds). Seabuckthorn (Hippophae L.): A multipurpose Wonder Plant. Vol. 1: Botany, harvesting and processing technologies. New Delhi: Indus Publishing Company; 2003. p.315—333.
- Dale AG, Gali D. Repetitive vegetative propagation of first-year sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) cuttings. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 2018;(98):609—615. doi: 10.1139/cjps-2017-0039
- Guliev AS. Breeding of seabuckthorn green cuttings in conditions of the botanical garden of the National Academy of Sciences of the Kyrgyz Republic. Izvestiya VUZov Kyrgyzstana. 2014;(3):75—76. (In Russ).
- Musoev SM, Mamadayozov KA, Usufbekova M. Influence of different cutting planting period on implanting green graft of Hippophae rhamnoides L. in the West of Pamir. News of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tajikistan. Department of Biological and Medical Sciences. 2007;(1):39—44. (In Russ).
- Zubarev YA, Shmatova TM. Influence of seabuckthorn green cuttings planting period on quality of plant material in conditions of partial film cover. In: Agrarnaya nauka — s el’skokhozyaistvennomu proizvodstvu Mongolii, Sibirskogo regiona, Kazakhstana i Bolgarii: Sbornik nauchnykh dokladov. [Agrarian science — to agricultural industry of Mongolia, Siberian Region, Kazakhstan and Bulgaria: conference proceedings]. Novosibirsk: Mongol’skaya akademiya agrarnykh nauk; 2013. p.72—73. (In Russ).
- Tsybikova O, Guseva N, Bandanova A. Reproduction of berry and decorative cultures by green cuttings on the base of The Buryat State Academy of Agriculture. In: Aktual’nye voprosy razvitiya agrarnogo sektora baikal’skogo regiona [Actual issues of agricultural sector development of the Baikal region: conference proceedings]. Ulan-Ude: Buryatskaya gosudarstvennaya sel’skokhozyaistvennaya akademiya imeni V.R. Filippova publ.; 2019. p.71—75. (In Russ).
- Zubarev YA, Gunin AV, Vorobjeva AV. The features of root development of green cuttings of different sea-buckthorn varieties in semi-covered greenhouses. Bulletin of Altai state agricultural university. 2019; (171):27—31. (In Russ).
Supplementary files
